The Appropriate Intensity of Rail Transit Station Area near Historic Districts: A Case Study of Shanghai, Nanjing, Kyoto and Tokyo

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

AESOP

Abstract

This paper examines the appropriate development intensity of rail transit station areas located near historic districts, addressing the challenge of balancing transit-oriented development with heritage conservation. While contemporary urban planning promotes compact, high-density, and three-dimensional development around metro stations, historic districts are constrained by strict regulations on building height, density, and urban form. To address this issue, the study develops a multidimensional development intensity index incorporating building height, building density, and above- and below-ground floor area ratios. Eighteen rail transit stations located near historic districts in Shanghai, Nanjing, Tokyo, and Kyoto are analysed through comparative, multi-path methods that account for station accessibility isochrones and the spatial relationship between stations and surrounding heritage areas. The analysis identifies patterns of development intensity across different urban contexts and explores how accessibility, heritage protection, and land-use characteristics influence appropriate levels of development. The findings provide a framework for determining balanced development intensity around transit stations in historic districts and offer planning recommendations for integrating efficient public transport with the long-term preservation of urban heritage.

Description

Planning as a Transformative Action in an Age of Planetary Crisis. Proceedings of the AESOP Annual Congress 2025, Istanbul, Türkiye, 7–11 July 2025

Citation

Guo, X., & Zhu, Y. (2025). The Appropriate Intensity of Rail Transit Station Area near Historic Districts: A Case Study of Shanghai, Nanjing, Kyoto and Tokyo. In Proceedings of the AESOP Annual Congress 2025, Istanbul, Türkiye, 7–11 July 2025 (pp. 439–457). AESOP.

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Creative Commons license

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International