XXI AESOP Conference Napoli July 11-14 2007 Planning for the Risk Society. Dealing with Uncertainty, Challenging the Future Lwrececat 1008 | Esato Meeching M. h | |a1 Os) a wW1 Lbs, aay | Table of Contents 1. Welcome addresses 3 2. Conference main theme 7 3. Tracks 9 4. Roundtables 35 5. Schedule and day-by-day program 51 6. Mobile workshops 103 7. Study tours 109 8. Committee and board meetings 115 9. Conference guidelines 119 10. Conference facilities 123 11. Local organizing committee 125 12. Index of Authors 127 13. Sponsors 143 14. Maps 145 Kou gper A006 eles Aw L00F Liver All rights reserved. No part of this book can be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form, without a formal permission of the publisher. Program coordination_Daniela De Leo Cover_ Chiara Olga Moccia Graphics and layout_ Laura Lieto Welcome Addresses — AESOP President_ Peter Ache Dear Participants of the AESOP 2007 Annual Conference ‘Planning for the Risk Society’ The current topic of the Naples conference is a very important one: IPCC and the recent G8 summit have informed us about fast progressing environmental risks and signalled that decision makers change perceptions. The actions of civil society demand that we also come to concrete actions, beyond minimalist political consensus. It is high times to step forward from ‘knowledge to action’. In a recent meeting of AESOP’s past and actual presidents a recommendation was formulated in this spirit, speaking of space quality and the responsibility the art and science of planning as a profession has for people and places. The risk society clearly needs planning, i.e. we need to further develop our already huge knowledge about territorial processes and outcomes and share it with stake holders. We need to jointly define appropriate solutions and put them into practice, in social, environmental and economic terms. The current conference is the 21* for AESOP and has attracted a great interest from planning scholars from Europe and beyond, demonstrating that AESOP has developed a lot during its already twenty years of existence. The annual conference in Naples will again show, how rich and wide our planning knowledge is. For sure we will enjoy a good range of stimulating papers and exchange of ideas between planning scholars, educators and practitioners. | would like to thank the local chair Francesco Domenico Moccia and his colleagues from the organizing committee at the University of Napoli “Federico il” for all their efforts in preparing an outstanding event in a wonderful location. | wish you all a stimulating conference and a pleasant time in Naples. Peter Ache Welcome Addresses — Chair of the Local Organizing Committee_ Francesco D. Moccia The XXI AESOP Conference — second in Italy — is hosted at the University founded by the German emperor Frederic II, one of the largest in the country with 96.867 students enrolled, 3.121 professors and researchers, 13 Schools and 164 Programs. Planning has been taught in Architecture and Engineering, until in 2003 an independent program was established. Since 1999 a PhD course in planning theory has been engaging 6 students every year in a three-year program. The University of Naples welcomes the Conference with the start up of a brand new International Internet portal. The conferehce venue is a former school of Economics, now moved to a modern suburban campus together with natural sciences, and reserved to the functions of a Congress Centre, taking advantage of its location in the very core of the city well supported by a number of hotels and other tourist facilities. Naples is rooted in a Greek city founded in the VIII century bC. Since the beginning, trade across the Mediterranean Sea was its main economy. In this way, the city was open to host travellers and exchange goods and ideas with Strangers. On the other side, it takes advantage of a special natural setting. Here, mild climate and fertility of soil mix with the most terrible natural hazards (as floods, landslides, earthquakes, voicano eruptions) whose victims are famous in history (everyone recalls Pompeii and Ercolano destruction). The Conference theme and the hosting region share a strong linkage in times when social and natural hazards are filling the European policy agenda and ask planners to offer their expertise to face more than one challenge. That is why a large program of mobile workshops and study tours has been organized. Not to advertise either local government or the ability of local planners with best practices. Both subjects feel the weight of unsolved problems of a marginal region — how many are still frightened about garbage disposal? Anywhere, showing the efforts made, and their mix of success and failure, confronting others plans, approaches and methods, there will be the opportunity to build up a ground of thinking and acknowledgment. Keynote speakers were chosen to offer the wider range of problems according to the different meanings of risk. Any effort was made to assure the European Union level policy orientation, according with the European. nature of our Association. The dialogue AESOP engages next July will be open and cross tracks and sessions. The European Planning Community is growing and articulating more and more around stable research interests, feeding working groups for whom the Conference is a meeting opportunity. The result of this scientific development is the number of tracks, and the grouping of colleagues around them. The willingness to have an open discussion may be noticed in the number of round | 5 _ | Welcome Addresses — | | tables. We are also witnessing the spread in time and place of very specialized meetings that feed the Conference tracks and round tables. In fact, should be an AESOP care to preserve the Conference as the ending confluence point where the growing complexity of our professional field meets our teaching obligations. Francesco Domenico Moccia AESOP is a network of universities and university departments that teach and conduct research within the field of urban and regional planning. The network exists to promote the development of the teaching curricula and research within the Member Schools through regular dialogue, exchange visits and the dissemination of research and best practice. These aims are achieved through an Annual Congress where staff and students make presentations and discuss papers on European, national, regional and local spatial planning issues, as well as debates on planning curricula. A threeday Ph.D workshop precedes the Congress. The AESOP Newsletter provides information on the activities of member schools, reports of AESOP Working Groups and other issues. More information about AESOP at: www.aesop-planning.com. Main Theme cana Planning for the risk society Dealing with uncertainty, challenging the future The conference’s main theme, the risk, is not just a concern for the hosting city, but more generally a challenging issue to planning theorists and practitioners. As aconcept, risk includes different meanings and dimensions, such as natural risk, security, human risk on the environment, conflicts and social marginality in peripheral areas. In this perspective, it is to be connected to the more “classic” issue of uncertainty as a basic dimension of planning practice, rising new questions on contemporary metropolitan government all over Europe. Studies on this matter — such as Beck’s and Giddens’s in the field of social sciences — open a new theoretical framework where the relation between planning and ethics becomes a key-issue, in a planning perspective based on shared values such as trust, cooperation and mutual care. Consequently, risk deals also with social instability, marginality and fragmentation issues, as some recent UE urban policies have stressed out focusing on strategies of cooperation, inclusion and partnerships. As a local mainframe, risk is mainly related to the volcanic risk in Napoli metro area: in these past years, some cultural shift occurred in plans and policies dealing with natural risk, moving from an “emergency planning ideology” to a deeper concern for environmental and landscape planning issues, as well as local-based development policies. All over Europe, in times of global changes and conflicts, this concern for risk shows different declinations, and the Aesop Conference can be a starting point to put the debate forward with original and innovative research contributions. mm Tracks TRACKS OVERVIEW Trackchairs: HEATHER CAMPBELL, STEFANO MORONI 1.1 Epistemological approaches to planning theory Chair: HEATHER CAMPBELL 1.2 Political and social relevance in risk assessment and planning Chair: STEFANO MORONI 1.3 Methodological issues and ethical challenges Chair: ERNEST ALEXANDER 1.4 General approaches suggested by complexity Chair: PATSY HEALEY 1.5 Reassessing communication in planning theory Chair: JEAN HILLIER 1.6 Risk tassonomies, interpreting risk in the space Chair: JAMES THROGMORTON 1.7 Risk as concept shift: implications on theory and practice Chair: GABRIELE PASQUI 1.8 Planning technologies to face natural risks Chair: TORE SAGER 1.9 Risk mitigation policy and planning practices Chair: LAURA LIETO Trackchairs: SIMIN DAVOUDI, ANDREAS FALUDI 2.1 EU territorial agenda and European diversity Chair: SIMIN DAVOUDI 2.2 Cross-border cooperation Chair: ANDREAS FALUDI 2.3 Trans-national learning and partnership Chair: SANDRO FABBRO | 10 = Tracks — 2.4 Territorial aspects of environmental risks Chair; NICOLE SCHAFER 2.5 Territorial cohesion and spatial policy Chair: DOMINIC STEAD 2.6 Spatial visions and concepts Chair: GABRIELE TATZBERGER 2.7 EU policies and programmes Chair: UMBERTO JANIN RIVOLIN RACK 3: PLANNING EDUCATION AND PRACTICE 3.1 International education Chair: MARCEL BAZIN 3,2 Problem solving in planning practice and education Chair; ALEX FUBINI 3.3 Teaching environmental planning Chair; JORGEN AMDAM 3.4 Educational methods Chair; MICHAEL NEUMAN lraekchairs: FRANCO ARCHIBUGI, ARTUR DA ROSA PIRES 4.1 Strategies for metropolis Chair, FRANCO ARCHIBUGI 4,2 The impact of development projects Chair; ARTUR DA ROSA PIRES 4,3 Economic-spatial development in a glocal environment Chair; PETER ACHE 4.4 Spatial planning and economic development Ohair, KRISTINA L NILSSON — Tracks — 4.5 Issues from peripheral regions Chair: TOM ANGOTTI 4.6 Development models and processes Chair: HEMALATAC. DANDEKAR 4.7 Developing local resources Chair: ANDREAS VOIGT Trackchairs: HUW THOMAS, FRANCESCO LO PICCOLO 5.1 Culture, diversity and the city Chair: FRANCESCO LO PICCOLO 5.2 Cross-national learning in planning Chair: HUW THOMAS 5.3 Planning cities among conflicting visions and values Chair: GLENDA GARELLI 5.4 Migration, diversity and integration Chair: GERAINT ELLIS 5.5 Planning and cultural diversity in the cities of the South Chair: SIMONE ABRAM Trackchairs: LOUIS ALBRECHTS, ALESSANDRO BALDUCCI 6.1 Planning and governance for city regions Chair: LOUIS ALBRECHTS 6.2 Interistitutional multilivel relationships Chair: ALESSANDRO BALDUCCI 6.3 Dealing with risk in planning and governance Chair: ENRICO GUALINI 6.4 Civil society Chair: DIDIER PARIS 6,5 Ways of participation Ohair: DAVID LUDLOW Tracks 6.6 Conflicts, communication and understanding Chair: KANISHKA GOONEWARDENA 6.7 Researching new paths of governance Chair, THOMAS MATTA 6.0 New profiles of local actors Chair: BENJANIM DAVY 6.9 Integrating stakeholders and planning tools Chair: ELENA DIMITROVA Traekchairs: JUDITH ALLEN 7.1 Housing in the process of urban regeneration Chair JUDITH ALLEN 7,2 Risk, exclusion, gentrification and related issues Chair; DAVE SHAW 7.3 Housing policy Chair: ANDREI SKABURSKIS 7.4 Social networking, organization, and action Ohair: ENRICA MORLICCHIO 7.5 Housing in the urban context Chair; GIUSEPPE MAZZEO 7.6 Sustainable housing Chair, ANNA HAWORTH 7.7 Housing requirements Chair: NIKOS KARADIMITRIOU 13 — Tracks — Trackchairs: RACHELLE ALTERMANN, WILLEM SALET 8.1 Economic interests and land regulations Chair: WILLEM SALET 8.2 Plannign laws confronting general claims Chair: RACHELLE ALTERMANN 8.3 Ecological issues in land regulation Chair: GREG LLOYD 8.4 Rules and Policies Chai: EDOARDO CACERES 8.5 Innovations in planning laws Chair: CORRADO ZOPPI 8.6 Tools and case studies Chair: BERNARD BIZET RACK 9: URBAN DESIGN AND PHYSICAL FORM 9.1 Using risk as a tool of urban design Chair: CRISTINA BIANCHETTI 9.2 National and local identities Chair: TANER OC 9.3 Problem solving and urban design Chair: JOHN PUNTER 9.4 Rebuilding the fragmented city Chair: MARICHELA SEPE 9.5 Meaning and value of urban spaces Chair: PAULO SILVA 14 — | Tracks — Traekehairs: ANGELA HULL, LUCA BERTOLINI 10.1 The challenges of Mega Urban Transport Projects: international views Chair: ANGELA HULL 10.2 Mega Urban Transport Projects and case-studies Chair; LUCA BERTOLINI 10.3 Transport, social cohesion and economic development Chair: NICK BOGIAZIDES 10.4 Sustainable transport modes - in search of best practices Chair: CHRIS YEWLETT 10.5 Land use / transport integration — emerging planning approaches Chair: SHIN LEE 10.6 Land use / transport integration — new planning tools Chair; CAREY CURTIS 10.7 Sustainable transport modes — institutional issues and policy transfer Chair: KATHRINE STROMMEN RACK 11: NEW PLANNING TECHNOLOGIES IN RISK SOCIETIES 11.1 Information management on natural hazards Chair: ELISABETE SILVA 11.2 Planning models and risk management Chair: DINO BORRI 11.3 People confronting natural hazards Chair: FRANCESCO SELICATO 11.4 Vulnerable and precarious cities Chair: GIOVANNI RABINO 15 —_ — Tracks — Trackchairs: GIORGIO PICCINATO, KLAUS KUNZMANN 12.1 Cultural policy and urban heritage Chair: GIORGIO PICCINATO 12.2 Policy of valorization Chair: KLAUS KUNZMANN 12.3 Interpreting historical centres Chair: PANTALEON SKAYANNIS 12.4 The aim of sustainability Chair: ALEX DEFFNER 12.5 Conflicting preservations Chair: TEJO SPIT Trackchairs: DOMENICO PATASSINI, TERRY MARSDEN 13.1 Planning the rural/periurban space Chair: TERRY MARSDEN 13.2 Landscapes at risk Chair: DOMENICO PATASSINI 13.3 Rural/urban changing relationships Chair: CORRADO DIAMANTINI Trackchairs: PETTER NAESS, ROBERTO GAMBINO 14.1 Safe sites and settlements Chair: PETTER NAESS 14.2 Landscapes Chair: ROBERTO GAMBINO 16 =~ | Tracks 14,3 European ecological policy Ohair; AGATA SPAZIANTE 14.4 Information technology tools Ohair, TERESA FIDELIS 14,5 Sustainable cities Chair GERT DE ROO 14.6 Institutional rensponsibilities Chair, MAROS FINKA 14.7 Challenges from climate changes Chair: FILIPPO SCHILLECI 14.8 Land, landscape and energy Chair, PETER DRIESSEN 17 | | Tracks — Track1_ Planning theory in a risk society Track chairs: Heather Campbell h.j.campbell @ shef.ac.uk Stefano Moroni stefano.moroni@polimi.it Statement of track chairs The title of the track embraces the theme of the conference, namely planning in the context of ‘risk’. Such a theme echoes current sensibilities both in terms of environmental concerns consequent upon climate change but also social and economic concerns linked to crime, terrorism, poverty, exclusion and marginalisation, amongst others. However, ‘risk’ is hardly a new concept as those who have long had to negotiate the voicanic context of Naples can testify. The issue for the Planning Theory Track is to seek to understand the nature of contemporary societies and the implications such contexts have for the possibilities associated with the making of place, both in relation to process and outcomes. Moreover, how far is ‘risk’ the dominating descriptor of contemporary society? Prompted by debate around the notion of the ‘risk society’, the following represent themes which participants in the conference might wish to explore: What implications does the notion of the (contemporary) risk society have for planning practices and outcomes? What role for the state within contemporary (risk) societies? What is the appropriate balance between voluntarism and coercion, between individual interests and the public good? What does ‘social justice’ and ‘environmental justice’ mean within contemporary societies and what are the tensions and convergences between these concepts? What implications does the notion of ‘risk’ have for civil society and its relationship to the processes of the state? Can and should society trust spatial planners to improve everyday living conditions? What responsibilities do planners have to the various communities they serve? |—_ Tracks — | Track 2_ European territorial cooperation and cohesion policy Track chairs Simin Davoudi Simin. Davoudi @ newcastle.ac.uk Andreas Faludi a. faludi @ otb.tudelft.ni Statement of track chairs Following a well-attended and highly successful launch of a dedicated Conference Track on ‘territorial cohesion’ in Vienna Congress in 2005, we have been invited by the Organising Committee of the AESOP 2007 Congress to chair a track on this theme. While for some commentators the decisive ‘no vote’ in the Dutch and French referenda was a sign of declining interest in the territorial cohesion agenda, it has now become clear that the faith in territorial cohesion was not necessarily dependent on the proposed Constitution being ratified. This is reflected in the continuing appearance of territorial cohesion as a topic of the EU Informal Ministerial meetings. The publication of the Territorial Agenda of the European Union based on a document called The Territorial State and Perspective of the European Union under the German Presidency in 2007 will be another step towards the development of this agenda. What keeps the debate alive and thriving, however, is not so much the mentioning of the term territorial cohesion in the EU’s official documents, but the fact that it has become the spatial manifestation of the European social model and as such has been subject to similar contestations. A particular aspect of this model is the way it approaches various manifestations of what Ulrich Beck in his many works describes as the Risk Society. In the context of risk society such manifestation means that individuals’ life chances are not only shaped by the extent to which they are subjected to, and protected from, typical biographical risks (such as unemployment, disability, poverty, illness, old age), but also by where they live and work. In other words, people’s life chances are influenced by the location and quality of places and territories; by typical spatial risks (such as inaccessibility, isolation, pollution, exposure to natural and technological hazards, place stigma). Hence, the quality of places where people live and work in can influence their access to economic and social opportunities and the quality of their life. The concept of territorial cohesion ‘spatializes’ the biographical risks that people face throughout their life course. Potential themes in this Track, we welcome papers which draw on conceptual, empirical and experiential work (such as work undertaken under Framework Programme 6, ESPON, Interreg) and which will address issues related to the foliowing themes: | | | | | | Tracks _* | What does ‘territorial cohesion’ mean in different context and at different spatial scales? How does it relate to spatial planning, particularly in the context of the risk society? How can we measure it? What type of methodalogies, criteria and indicators exist or can be developed? What would be the application and implication of territorial cohesion for the national and regional spatial policies? How the concept is being developed through territorial cooperation? Would ‘territorial cohesion’ be a European ‘holy grail’? Track 3. Planning education and practice Track chairs Alex Fubini alex @polito.it Marcel Bazin Marcel. Bazin @ univ-reims.fr Statement of track chairs Planning education is undergoing significant changes throughout Europe following the implementation of the Bologna Declaration, and with the “3+2+3” model. Consequently, University education is progressively moving towards a practice-oriented approach not only when we consider the undergraduate skilljob oriented curriculum of the 3+2+3 reform, but even more so when moving up to post-graduate courses. The process is gradual and differs according to the subject area or country. It seems to be especially difficult in a field like planning, due to the necessary and ongoing interaction between the academic world and planning practitioners. Therefore we can rightly ask ourselves to what extent planning education may realistically include planning practice. in seeking answers to this question, the debate in most countries focuses on skills versus knowledge. In the past it was not just the job but also the skill for life: nowadays, due to the increasing speed of change, it’s a question of lifelong learning of ever-changing skills, offering teaching consistently with experience, as well as learning-by-doing as the prime form of knowledge. Is this what future planning students ought to be doing? Whereas planning expertise clearly ought to be a planning policy tool , thus only viable within the practice itself, will such skill-oriented approach enable new graduate students to understand the “whys” of planning? The present track would like to encourage our re-thinking these issues in relation | | 20 —_ | | | | | Tracks — lo the different tiers of education, but also presenting experiences to discuss the ovolving relationship between planning education and practice in conlomporary and future university environment in depth. Sugqosted themes The tollowing questions introduce some of the key-issues in the field, which participants might wish to explore: lo what extent does planning education survive and develop in the relation hetwoon theory and practice? (What is the impact of the theory/practice interface on planning education?) lo what extent is it possible to combine a polytechnic-like approach, i.e.: very open to different theories and methods, with the goals of a much more practice onantod teaching system? How to adopt a reflective approach in teaching, focussing on practice now that {lioorlas, at least in certain national contexts, have been increasingly forsaken? What is the difference between a student who can perform a given task or job altor 3-years job-oriented curriculum— until such time as his/her skills become autdated- and one , without any specific practice skills, who has been provided with the intellectual tools to learn in time consistently with everyday needs? Track 4_ Global challenges to local socio-economic development lack chairs Franco Archibugi trancoarchibugi @ tiscali. it Artur da Rosa Pires aip @csjp.ua.pt Statement of track chairs Falicy making at local level is undergoing drastic changes and/or is under intense preasures for further change due to globalization trends and emerging supranational and global governance patterns. The theme of this track, “Global Challenges to Local Socio-economic Development”, represents an opportunity to discuss and xhad some light on the multiple dimensions of this evolving global-local nexus, focusing particularly on the corresponding challenges to, and impacts on, the spatial planning system and current (or traditional) planning practices. We would like to encourage the submission of proposals on three different subjects: i) the Impacts on planning methods and approaches, ii) the impacts on the new phenomena and issues to be addressed, and iii) the impacts on the broader policy 21 — ! | | | Tracks — | | and institutional environment of spatial planning. Under each of these headings, different topics can be suggested (though these are by no means exclusive): 1)The impacts on planning methods and approaches: Integrated approach to planning (e.g. socio-economic and land-use or spatial planning comprehensive approach); Planning strategic issues (Balance between objectives and means); Systemic approach (inter-level and inter-government coordination and accounting); Planning, citizen involvement and institutional capacity building; Planning, measurement, evaluation and institutional learning. 2)The impacts on the new phenomena and issues to be addressed: Local policy agenda; Cohesion and other supra-national policies; Planning and technological changes (including ICT and digital systems); The role of knowledge and creativity in development policies; The local sustainability agenda; Migration movements; Tourism development issues;Socio-economic disparities, social fragmentation and planning for welfare; The social economy and development planning. 3)The impacts on the broader policy and institutional environment of planning: Changes in the nature of State intervention in the spatial economy; New local government and governance paradigms; Planning education and the europeanisation of spatial planning; International networks and changes in spatial planning and policy; Institutional discourses on spatial planning and the planning system. Track 5. Planning in multicultural societies Track chairs Huw Thomas ThomasH1 @cardiff.ac.uk Francesco Lo Piccolo fpiccolo @unipa.it Statement of track chairs A wide range of conditions, living standards, social groups, expectations and needs are symptomatic and salient characteristics of the contemporary city. fo | 22 — | | — Tracks — | | The presence of multiple experiences, processes and people involved making up the urban dimension is to be seen as an established fact: differences (for example, in age, ethnicity, gender, class, religion and culture) are concentrated in cities on various scales and levels of intensity. Recent literature illustrates the new scenarios of difference stemming from such phenomena as international migrations, post-colonialism or the rise of new forms of articulation of the society (Loomba, 1998; Sandercock, 2000). Thus, the theme of difference is more and more frequently dealt with in disciplinary debates, starting from the acknowledgement of the fragmentation of the contemporary society into an archipelago of “minority” and “plural” groups (Soja, 1989; Sibley, 1995). These groups express specific needs and claim specific rights and benefits affecting the dimension of the city and urban space. The problems arising from this might be tackled in various ways changing from time to time from either repressive, or discriminatory to tolerant, inclusive or dialogical-communicative. The project of creating mulicultural societies (defined — if vaguely- as societies where a number of cultural groups have equal standing ) might reasonably be regarded as a good example of a risky undertaking of the kind Beck and Giddens have identified as distinctive of reflexive modernity. Unsurprisingly, perhaps, multiculturalism in this sense is under critical scrutiny, intellectually and politically. In this track we anticipate that there may be contributions seeking to explore the spatial implications of different positions in the ‘multiculturalism debate’. Perhaps others will wish to analyse the shifting meaning of ‘culture’ in these debates, and especially the growing elision of religion, or faith, and culture. What might be the implications of this for governance , and planning in particular? It could be said that reflections on minorities and the city force us to reconsider a number of principles which have been neglected or only partially dealt with by the disciplinary debate, beginning with the concepts of equality and inequality, dignity and autonomy, political responsibility and representation. At the same time it is possible to hypothesise that what is at the present moment denied or opposed on the political front can nevertheless be achieved through local action by social movements, and even by participation in government, in the transformation of the city. Such actions assume the role and the characteristics of a true plan for emancipation (Friedmann, 1992), which refers to an ethical dimension of the planning discipline. The existence, or the expectation of the existence, of multicultural cities and thus of urban settlements which are in one form or another the expression of a society of minorities, will very likely force us to rethink the common interpretation of the planning process. Precisely because of the presence of silent or unexpressed demands which reflect the unequal distribution of power, resources and opportunities, it is desirable to reformulate the planning process so that it can be not only an instrument of regulation and a solution to conflicts (in a variety of ways and adopting varied criteria), but also a means for redistributing opportunity. These are only some themes which develop from considering the mutual implication of planning and multiculturalism, and we very much welcome contributions on other dimensions of this topic. — 23 _ | | Tracks oe | | Track 6. Participation and governance Track chairs Alessandro Balducci sandro.balducci @ polimi. it Louis Albrechits Louis. Albrechts @ asro. kuleuven.be Statement of track chairs The track on participation and governance invites contributions across the range of issues which planning currently confront: crisis in representative democracy, problems of fragmentation, issues of diversity/multiculturality, administrative boundaries etc. Participation has been a key concept to break up the traditional vision of planning as a technical and political process in which citizens, stakeholders and non institutional actors are left out from the decision making process. There has been a great variety of experiences with top-down and bottom-up forms of participation which have explored the fertility of the concept but also the limits of a rethoric of participation. Governance has been another key concept which has posed more recently the same idea of participation into a wider view of the changing forms of government. To cope with growing fragmentation and complexity the governing activity has to include actors and forms of regulation which were in the past outside the public sphere. The problems, developments and challenges planning is facing today ask for more creativity: creative institutions, creative politicians, creative civil servants, creative citizens. All this implies openness to unconventional ideas and risk taking. What the track wants to achieve is a new level of interaction which stimulates advances in debates in different countries and different political and planning cultures on the wide-ranging subjects of this track. We suggest to focus upon what we consider some key issues in this field: Governance: re-focussing planning as an activity related to international, transnational, crossborder, city-region wide networks and deep local roots; Adminsitrative boundaries: most of which are at odds with the new relational perspective in planning; Redefinition of relationships between planning and politics but also between planning and implementation agents; Conflicts: related to the planning content/process, to sectoral fragmentation, to different policy levels, public-private conflicts but also between different groups in society Emerging forms of planning: strategic and participatory planning We would like to encourage reflections on these issues but also presentation of experiences and case-studies which could allow to discuss in depth the relationship between planning, participation and governance. | | | : 24 —_ |— Tracks ml | Track 7. Housing, urban decline and social exclusion Track chairs Judith Allen JAlien4049 @aol.com Mark Tewdwr-Jones m.tewdwr-jones @ ucl.ac.uk Statement of track chairs One of the core ironies of the risk society is that while it encourages attempts from the centre to control and direct all state activities, the methods of control which are adopted (privatisation — in all its meanings, outsourcing to voluntary organisations, reorganisation in search of efficiency gains, public-private partnerships, etc) simultaneously disorganise localised welfare delivery to the most vulnerable elements in the population. As the state reshapes itself by hiving off its activities to market and civil society, it simultaneously reshapes both markets and civil society. Within the population, those least at risk organise to protect themselves which simultaneously increases the life risks to those least able to protect themselves. The track welcomes papers which develop this theme by: showing how macro-level changes affect the practice of planning in areas of urban decline or for populations at risk of social exclusion; examining innovative responses to meeting the needs of sectors of the population most at risk; debating the ‘stories’ of urban and community life that are marginalized from official planning strategies and responses; or illustrating forces within planning processes that either exclude or attempt to include communities in urban change. Track 8. Planning law, institutions, and property rights Track chairs Willem Salet w.g.m.salet @ uva.nl Rachelle Altermann alterman @ techunix.technion.ac. il | — Tracks =— | | | Statement of track chairs Planners in all countries are both constrained and empowered by legal authority and procedures pertaining to the regulation of land, its ownership, use and development. They must deal with the institutions and procedures set up by these laws. Yet, the particulars of these laws and procedures vary from one country to another and merit cross-national exchange of knowledge. Eight years ago the first Planning and Law track was launched at the AESOP annual congress. Since then, this track — with some variations on its name - has consistently been featured at AESOP, in the joint AESOP-ACSP conferences and in the World Congresses. This track has become the main international venue for planning scholars who are interested in the relationship between planning procedures, laws and regulations, and property rights (Rachelle Alterman and colleagues are in the process of forming an Aesop Thematic Group that would focus on these issues). The track encompasses three major sub-areas: “Planning laws and procedures”, and “Planning institutions” and “planning and property rights”. These three areas are the columns that together span the major relationships between planning, law, and administration. Papers may be country-specific or cross-national. Planning laws and procedures: This sub-theme may include a wide variety of topics such as land use regulations (zoning, development permits, design and historic regulations, open-space preservation, and more), law-based public participation conflict resolution, the administration of the planning system, and the issue of enforcement. Planning institutions: This sub-theme may cover the theory and justification behind the existence of government and non-government institutions that do planning or implementation; their various modes of action, the interrelationships among them (competition or cooperation), and more. Planning and property rights: This sub-theme encompasses issues pertaining to the relationship between property rights and planning. It may include theoretical and ethical perspectives, or specific issues such as public and private rights in land, development rights (their management, transfer, etc.), expropriation of property, developments agreements, and more. Contributors are encouraged to remember that conference participants represent a diversity of legal and institutional systems and cultures, different languages, and different terminology. Each participant should remember to make the legal and procedural contexts and terms as clear as possible. 26 —_ —_— Tracks — | | Track 9. Urban design and physical form Track chairs Cristina Bianchetti c.bianchetti @ fastwebnet. it Taner Oc Taner.Oc @nottingham.ac.uk Statement of track chairs There are various dimentions of risk in urban design and physical form and they raise a number of questions. We can approach risk in the built environment from two different perspectives.The first refers to the ecology of fear. Here risk refers to disastrous events and to their impact, on territorial vulnerability and to mitigation strategies. In this way, links with urban design and physical form mainly concern the ways which the project is defined in relationship to other fields of knowledge, techniques and languages. These different aspects explore new territories. The second view refers to social exclusion, to social marginality and to the loss of safety resulting in the demise of urbanity as defined by Henri Raymondthe urbanity as a combination of practices linked to the art of occupying space and the rules that governs the conflicts around this art. The focus of the track is the second view. The “Urbanity Crisis” changes our knowledge about the “the art of being in the city”. This changes our habitus and creates difficulties in cultural exchange. In the end it changes the physical, the social and the cultural form of the city. How can contemporary urban design confront this condition? Main topics and highlighted themes The emergence of new perceived risks and experienced risks is rapidly modifying the interpretations, approaches and theories of urban design. It’s rapidly modifying our territories too. The aim of this track is to inquire about material, tangible and physical consequences of the risk and the ways to address them. , Highlighted themes are: New urban topographies. Risk increases fear, it gives rise to fitfulness and suspicion. It changes physical form of the city; it makes space less porous through devices that contribute to its articulation and crack topological space: edges, borders, thresholds, accesses, walls, etc. There are firm limits and barriers. How can we challenge new topographies? How can we study them? Is it possible to oppose their logic? Is it possible to devise a new negotiation between endurance and porousness? _ 27 — | Tracks —— | In the search of public space. \n the modern city, the design of public space has to take into account religion, power, policy representation, etc. The best contemporary projects investigate how isolated individuals use crowded places and they react to certain dimensions of public space. This condition requires visual mediation. <> as Richard Sennett wrote recently. At the core of this track is “How to live together”. Risk, urban design and physical form in the XX century city. The tradition of European urbanism is marked with exclusion and inclusion practices. In these practices we can find its same substance. This track inquire into urban design practices to challenge social exclusion and to explore ways to stem social exclusion. Track 10. Transport planning and mobility infrastructures Track chairs Angela Hull a.d.hull@ hw.ac.uk Luca Bertolini L.Bertolini@uva.nl Statement of track chairs The new modernity is characterised by individualisation and voiuntarily induced risks according to Ulrich Beck (Risk Society, Towards a New Modernity, 1992). We are just becoming aware of the magnitude of the risks induced by our transport investments - pollution, the negative effects on climate change, public health and road fatalities, to name just a few. Our future is bound up with risks that we are producing now to gain the benefits of “space-time densification” (Dupuy, 1999:16) in the complex lifestyles we now live. Risk is the AESOP congress theme in 2007 and we welcome, in this track, innovative and challenging perspectives on the way we experience risks to health and the environment from current transport choices. In particular: The empirical quantification of these risks. Critical examination of the rationalities that underpin individual transport choice. Critical examination of the bureaucratic rationality of decisions to deal with the perceived hazards and insecurities induced by our modern lifestyles. Public perceptions of transport security, and/ or health and environmental risks of transport choice. This track also encourages original and innovative research contributions on | | 28 — . | nl Tracks — transport planning and policy that enhance our understanding of sustainable accessibility and the way in which transport and land use measures can create a synergistic effect towards more sustainable city region transport solutions. We particularly welcome evaluations of city experimentation and implementation of new approaches which will strengthen our knowledge base on the interaction between spatial dynamics and mobility under different contextual conditions. You can find out more about the research interests of the AESOP Transport Research Group by clicking on this link: http://www.aesop-planning.com/Groups_webpages/TP/index_tp.htm You will find the papers from the last workshop entitled: Urban Transportation planning: a policy design challenge? hosted by AMIDSt, University of Amsterdam at: hitp:/Awww2. fmg.uva.ni/transportplanning/ Track 11. New planning technologies in risk societies Track chairs Elisabete Silva es424 @cam.ac.uk Dino Borri d.borri@ poliba.it Statement of track chairs Technology is considered to be a solution but also a source of problems. At the same time that technology can be used as a valuable tool to answer to the multiple risks mankind is facing, the development of technology is also the source of multiple problems (i.e cause of pollution). We are now in an evolution stage that relies entirely on technological achievements and, therefore, a menace to.technology is a menace to mankind itself. Consequently the vulnerability to technological failure or collapse is also a risk and a souce of concern. This session’s subject will try to embrace the study and responses to risk through the use of new planning technologies. With this goal we welcome papers that explore the study of technology and risk: “Natural risks” (floods, forest fires, hurricanes, earthquakes); “Man-made risks” (from more traditional approaches of pollution, urban risks, infrastructures, mass migrations, to new risk studies of telecommunications, stock market risks, terrorism, etc); The clarification of the subjects of risk, the exploration of risk, vulnerability and _ 29 a | — Tracks — | hazard and the provision of valuable information for planning, insurances, emergency management, science and the public in the context (and with the use of) new; The infrastructures to manage risk (hard and soft); Risk reduction - including emergency planning, education and awareness campaigns, public participation in risk reduction planning; New risks in a risk society. Track 12. Culture, heritage and spatial planning Track chairs Klaus Kunzmann klaus. kunzmann @udo.edu Giorgio Piccinato piccinat @ uniromas3. it Statement of track chairs The concept of historic centre is born out of the process of construction of the modern industrial city: its new size and rate of growth were putting strong pressure on the old core. Rising land values, together with (or hiding behind) hygienic and functional reasons provided the background for a systematic renewal of the old historic fabrics. It took more than a century for the society to acknowledge the “historic” value of the urban fabric, even when lacking of important “monuments”. As a matter of fact only in the last decades the idea of preserving historic centres was accepted by the society as a whole (not only by the intellectuals, who were at the avant-garde of the process). Citizens started to appreciate in the historic centres what was missing in the contemporary city: the amount and measure of public space for social exchange and representation, building types that although similar remain individually recognisable, people around itself, that is not the crowds of the stadium nor the desert of the modern periphery. In short, the historic fabric went back into the market, as far as to become a status symbol. Some results have been achieved: the idea of conservation is today not only universally accepted (in the wealthy Europe) but it is also widening its horizons so as to include the 19th and early 20th century as well the whole landscape. More generally, we can say that the historic dimension of our spatial environment has become part of our daily life. In the meantime, development of the tourist industry, especially of some of its main components -cultural and religious tourism- seemed to provide the 30 —_ | | — Tracks — resources necessary to implement conservation policies. This however has a cost: all ground floors are turned into shops, all first floors into restaurants (with many switches between the two), while streets and squares are equipped with seats for the elderly and toys for the little kids, in order to let the adults to perform their shopping duties. A composite crowd fills these spaces: visitors, lunch-time employees but, overall, buyers. What kind of city is this now? Exactly the opposite of what we were looking for: a city where different kind of people as well as different kind of activities could share the same space, where the space could identify a community of interests and values, where all this was translated in a coherent sequence of private and public buildings, where a large provision of public space hinted to a rich social interchange. That is, overall, a strong local identity. We have instead an overwhelming process of homogenisation in terms of pervasive commercial exploitation, where what is being sold is what is being produced throughout the world and local images aren’t but advertising icons. Local inhabitants are being pushed out by rising prices oriented to the tourist world market or induced by newcomers looking for more “prestigious” quarters and by all the inconveniences brought by tourist congestion. Instead of saving the diversity of the central historic district, we have absorbed it into the general scheme of the contemporary city, reducing it to an other mono-functional zone, that is just what we were trying to escape. Track 13. Landscape and rurban areas Track chairs Terry Marsden wit Gee marsdentk @ Cardiff.ac.uk : p due Domenico Patassini domenico @ iuav.it Statement of track chairs A rapid extension of urbanisation the word over has created areas that have both urban and rural characteristics. Some specialist, since the 1970s, was talking about ‘rurban areas’ and ‘rurbanisation processes’. The ‘rurban’ zones usually combine features of the intensive or extensive agriculture found in rural areas, suburban and industrial zones, changing the meaning of ‘border’ concept. A number of research projects were focused on the changing relationships in rural areas under urban pressure as the Fifth Framework Project for the European Commission, CGIAR Support group on Urban Agriculture, Global Initiative on Urban Agriculture, and Fao. The aims of most of the projects were | | a 31 — | | —_ Tracks —_ to help actors in rural areas to develop a rural- based service delivery system (so called ‘rural good and services - RGS) that could contribute to the preservation of the natural and cultural landscape and improve local energetic balances. The rural areas have been classified according to pressure criteria, either urbanization, tourist, industrialized agriculture, infrastructure and others, but town and countryside have been often approached as separate entities. This approach changes according to the country’s planning system but, generally, it . represents a questionable view to simply preserve the countryside as open space accompanied by a densification of activities and population in the cities or within sprawl areas. As the importance of agriculture is declining in the rural areas in most of the European countries, other functions are developing, transforming such areas in a multifunctional place that cannot be appreciated only from the narrow perspective of a RGS performance. Great thought must be devoted to long-term biodiversity management policy, long-term water and soil utilisation management, reduction of pollution, local climate control, planning for the attendant ecological, economic and social infrastructures. Besides, the rural areas, as for the urban ones, might be considered beyond the local urbanrural interactions, i.e. as a specific outcome of a game between global flows and local places. In the context of risk and global society rurban dimensions tend to merge spatial and foot-loose processes. | Potential themes | In this Track, we welcome papers which draw on conceptual, empirical and experiential work (Such as work undertaken under the mentioned Framework Project, interreg and alike) and which will address issues related to the following themes: What does ‘rurban’ mean in different contexts, at different spatial scales and within different planning systems? What sustainable development is needed for the ‘rurban’ zones? How does it relate to public policies and spatial planning, particularly in the context of the risk society? What are the supports for ‘rurban’ planning methods? How can we measure the net benefit of a ‘rurban’ approach at micro and macro scale? What would be the application and implication of rurban concept for the national and regional spatial policies? What are the problems of social capital development and equity in the ‘rurban’ zones (access to land, social safety net and so forth)? | _ Tracks ann | | | Track 14. Environmental! planning Track chairs Roberto Gambino roberto.gambino @ polito. it Petter Naess petter@plan.aau.dk The theme of Track 14, environmental planning, includes planning at different geographical levels, in different types of environments, and with a focus on various types of impacts. The theme encompasses a number of substantive issues of importance for environmentally conscious plan-making, environmental planning methodologies, as well as procedures of planning and decisionmaking. It also comprises ethical foundations and implications of environmental planning, including the issue of environmental justice and the value of nature apart from its utilization for human purposes. Exploration into ecological limits to development is also part of the theme, along with structural and cultural conditions influencing the possibilities for planning aiming to pursue environmental and sustainability objectives. Environmental planning may be conceived as a response to the growth of risks in an uncertainty perspective. In different forms (such as the plans for soil defence and water management, for forest management, for landscape protection, for parks and protected areas management and so on), it aims to reduce some of the risks threatening the living conditions of contemporary societies as well as future generations. In this attempt, it crosses people’s fears, anxieties and obsessions and tries to meet the social demand for security and quality of life, by means of scientific evaluations, technical proposals or even seductive dreams. The increasing complexity of environmental pressures and threats gives planning a crucial role; but, at the same time, it calls for profound changes in planning theories, styles and practices. Environmental planning is at the heart of planning for a sustainable development. A sustainable management of the key natural systems on which human life and prosperity depends requires careful planning of where, and in which ways, different types of human activities should be allowed to take place (e.g. urban development, extraction of raw materials, agriculture, construction of transport infrastructure). Since the 1970s, the scope of environmental planning has gradually been extended, and today its focus also includes the integration of environmental considerations into policies and plans of ‘developmental’ sectors. Sustainable urban development and urban ecology are important, broad topics. Environmental! planning involves the development of strategies for a less energy-demanding built environment and the facilitation of environmentally friendly forms of transport and energy supply. Planning for reduced future emissions of greenhouse gases is thus a key challenge, but _ _ 33 | | =— Tracks aed environmental planning also needs to address how to adapt to the climate changes already underway due to past and present emissions. In addition to its role in supporting a sustainable development, environmental planning encompasses the management and protection of a number of amenities that could hardly be considered crucial to the future fulfillment of material needs, but which may nevertheless be important to human well-being and cultural sense of belonging. Examples of the latter issues are the provision of parks and outdoor recreation areas, protection of esthetical landscape qualities, and cultural heritage protection. Finally, environmental planning also includes strategies — both in terms of decisions about future land use and through mitigation measures in existing built-up areas — against hazards such as floods, hurricanes, volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, landslides etc. With the more frequent occurrence of extreme weather likely to result from global warming, such risk-reduction will be an increasingly important task for planners. The production of environmental risks is strictly intertwined with social and cultural processes. In their turn, social and cultural processes have a powerful influence in determining risks and dangers or, at least, in worsening their effects. Furthermore, social and cultural processes influence the perception of risks, and consequently the responses to be given. Dealing with interactions between human societies and the natural environment, environmental planning depends on the combination of insights from a number of specialized fields. However, in current environmental planning practices we may observe a strong tendency to a growing “specialization” of tools and policies, in order to assure a proper treatment of each specific issue. This trend can be related, on one side, to the specialization of the scientific knowledge and the technological development; on the other side, to the complex diversification of public administration and control apparatus. But this leaning is in contrast with the need for a better integration of environmental and territorial policies, taking into account the failure of many sectoral policies (which have often produced effects far from those foreseen, or even opposite) and the search for synergies and complementarities among different public actions. Track 14 invites papers addressing all the above-mentioned aspects of environmental planning. We welcome papers contributing to on-going debates within environmental planning, and in particular papers opening up new and important topics of discussion. Papers based on interdisciplinary integration of knowledge are much appreciated. Recognizing that the development during recent years, as measured by several indicators, has proceeded in the opposite direction of environmental objectives in spite of refined methods of environmental planning and a steady growth in the number of planners dealing with these issues, we especially appreciate papers throwing light on the causes of gaps between environmental goals and implemented strategies, and ways to overcome barriers to an environmentally sustainable development. Roundtables —— ROUNDTABLES RT_A RT_B RT_C RT_D RT_E RT_F RT_G RT_H RT_I RT_L RESEARCH ETHICS IN THE CONTEXT OF RACIALISED CONFLICT AND OPPRESSION THE CHALLENGES OF THE “EUROPEAN SPATIAL PLANNING” TO THE REGIONAL PLANNING SYSTEMS IN ITALY CONVERGENCE AND TRANSFER: THE EXPERIENCE OF COMPARING FRANCE AND BRITAIN (HOW) DOES PLANNING THEORY AFFECT PRACTICE? INFORMALITY MATTERS CHANGING CONCEPTS OF SPACE AND PLACE IN SPATIAL PLANNING CLIMATE CHANGE, CITIES, AND URBAN PLANNING URBAN TRANSPORT PLANNING FOR THE XXI CENTURY: LEARNING FROM NAPLES AND CAMPANIA? TERRITORIALATTRACTIVENESS: CROSSING POINTS OF VIEW A COMMON EUROPEAN CORE CURRICULUM FOR PLANNING EDUCATION? |: | a Roundtables — | | RTA RESEARCH ETHICS IN THE CONTEXT OF RACIALISED CONFLICT AND OPPRESSION Conveners Francesco Lo Piccolo (University of Palermo) Huw Thomas (University of Cardiff) Time/Venue Date: 12 July 2007 Room 9 Time: 11.45-13.30 Participants Yasminah Beebeejaun, Manchester University Geraint Ellis, Queen’s University Belfast John Forester, Cornell University Francesco Lo Piccolo, University of Palermo Silvia Macchi, University “La Sapienza” Roma Libby Porter, Sheffield University Oren Yiftachel, Ben-Gurion University This roundtable will explore the moral and political issues which arise in researching in the context of conflict, in particular racialised conflict. The format of the roundtable provide a forum for informal discussion, within a loose agenda. It is anticipated that in the light of the discussion a set of key issues of concern to planning researchers will emerge, with some indications of how these might be considered in a systematic fashion. tit is widely acknowledged that social researchers must be sensitive to the power relations within their research . This, of course, means power relations in that which they are investigating (Flyvbjerg, 1998, 2001). But, in addition, they must be sensitive to their own relationships to those they encounter in their research . These sensitivities are essentially politico-ethical sensitivities. For example, as Ladsong-Billings (2000:273) puts it researchers must beware of regarding communities over which they can exercise a degree of social power as ‘data-plantations’. And , of course, research findings can facilitate the furtherance of social relations which may be ethically/politically questionable (Fine et al, 2000).).These considerations appear to lead us to agreeing the advantages of regarding | | Roundtables | | RT B THE CHALLENGES OF THE “EUROPEAN SPATIAL PLANNING” TO THE REGIONAL PLANNING SYSTEMS IN ITALY Convener: Attilio Belli, University “Federico Il” and national coordinator of Spera (Spatial Planning Harmonization for European Regional Administrations) research network Coordinator: Sandro Fabbro, University of Udine and Sphera research network Assistants: Beatrix Haselsberger, Vienna University of Technology; Anna Mesolella, University of Naples “Federico Il’ and Sphera research network Time/Venue Date: 13 July 2007 Room 4 Time: 9.00-11.00 Participants Andreas Faludi (Delft University of Technology): Main features and perspectives of European Spatial Planning Klaus Kunzmann (University of Dortmund): Harmonizing Spatial Planning in Europe: a dangerous venture Luigi Mazza (Polytechnic University of Milan): The unsolved problems of Italian planning system: subsidiarity and vertical coordination Pierluigi Properzi (University of LAquila and Sphera network): The regional planning systems in Italy and their perspectives Simin Davoudi (University of Newcastle): Polycentrism: a “mythical beast” or a possible operative paradigm? The focus of the roundtable aims to explore the existing and future possible interactions between “European Spatial Planning” (ESP=ESDP+ESPON) and regional planning systems in Europe, with a special emphasis on the specific case of relations between European Spatial Planning and regional planning systems in Italy. On the one hand, it is important to note that the ESDP has established some substantial principles in addressing European territorial planning. It can be assumed to be a “weak” instrument, due to its form as a non-binding guidance document. But, it has shown in several different cases to be capable of strongly orienting territorial policies and practices at different sub-national levels. On the other hand, different planning systems operate in Europe at the nationalregional level and this diversity can sometimes imply the risk of ineffectiveness, especially in interregional, cross-border or trans-national cooperation activities. Moreover the picture of local European planning traditions has to be updated and widened, taking into account the development of European territorial policies 38 —_ | | | _ Roundtables — | | | in the face of EU enlargement. For instance, are there any new regional planning perspectives that Eastern Europe could contribute to future versions of the ESDP? Thus the dialogue and coordination between European Spatial Planning and different regional planning systems over future aims and objectives is inevitable, particularly in terms of its implications for planning tools. Polycentrism, for example, possibly the strongest proposal that has emerged from European Spatial Planning, is attracting a great deal of interest in the regional territorial plans in Htaly as well as in its border countries Slovenia and Austria. In these cases, wider territorial planning systems seem not only helpful in, but also necessary for constructing common knowledge bases as well as shared territorial visions. RT_C CONVERGENCE AND TRANSFER: THE EXPERIENCE OF COMPARING FRANCE AND BRITAIN Convener: French and British Planning Study Group Time/Venue Date: 12 July 2007 Room 12 Time: 11.45-13.30 Participants Philip Booth, University of Sheffield Stuart Farthing, University of the West of England, Contemporary urban and regional changes and policy problems Suzy Nelson, University of Westminster, Actors and instruments Didier Paris, Université des Sciences et Technologies de Lille, Actors and instruments Olivier Sykes, University of Liverpool, Transnational and national spatial planning Roelof Verhage, Université Lumiére Lyon-2, Strategic spatial planning at the metropolitan level The French and British Planning Studies Group/Groupe d’étude sur l’urbanisme frangais and britannique has brought together academics and practitioners in France and Britain to discuss matters of mutual concern and to make comparisons between the approaches to spatial planning and the context within which spatial planning operates. The Group’s strength has come from the detailed understanding that its members have of planning in each others’ countries, and from the developing insights that have been gained through its | | — 39 —. | | Roundtables — | | programme of activities. The Group’s latest project is a book The Spatial Planning Systems of Britain and France/Laménagement et l’urbanisme en France et Grande-Bretagne, published simultaneously in English and French, which draws together work that has evolved over the past nine years of the Group’s existence at its biannual meetings. The purpose of this workshop is to explore the comparisons made in the book in the light of two questions: How far is it possible to talk about convergence of planning? Has there been a transfer of knowledge, ideas, and practice between the two countries? Reflecting on these two questions opens up the possibility of a deeper exploration of the nature of the planning activity and its rootedness in particular social, economic, cultural and political contexts. It also invites us to think carefully about how far and in what ways ideas and practice may be transferred from place to place. RT_D (HOW) DOES PLANNING THEORY AFFECT PRACTICE? Convener: E. R. Alexander Time/Venue Date: 14 July 2007 Room 6 Time: 9.00-11.00 Participants E. R. Alexander, Does planning theory affect practice, and if so, ‘how? Niraj Verma, Got Perspective? A justification for planning theory Stefano Moroni, Which theory? Made order vs. spontaneous order Alan March, Complementarity, convenience and opportunity in governance: When theory affects planning practice Discussant: Mickey Lauria It is agreed that there is (or should be) a symbiotic interaction between planning theory and planning practice. This Roundtable explores one aspect of this relationship, addressing a nested set of questions. The opening question: Can or does planning theory affect planning practice? raises several contingent questions. 40 — | _ Roundtabies a | If the answer to the first question is negative, then the question is: If not, why not? This question raises some definitional issues: perhaps the “failure” of theory to affect practice (the so-called “Theory-Practice Gap”) is the result of how we perceive “success” — as one contributor suggests. But generally it is the positive answer which raises the contingent questions that engage our attention: Why does planning theory affect practice? and: How does planning theory affect practice? These questions demand the empirical evidence for the finding that planning theory does affect practice. Several contributions analyze cases to show this and suggest how planning theory shapes planners’ practices. Panelists’ explanations include the “enlightenment” function as in the social transmission of knowledge, the cognitive framework or “perspective” that theory provides, and “constructivist theory” as the normative basis that justified planning. Another account of the relation between theory and practice suggests that it depends on the institutional context. Real-time discussion will undoubtedly provide additional interesting answers to these questions. RT_E INFORMALITY MATTERS Convener: Jean Hillier, GURU, Newcastle University Time/Venue Date: 14 July 2007 Room 5 Time: 11.15-13.00 Participants Vanessa Watson, University of Cape Town Ananya Roy, University of California Tumsifu Jonas Nnkya, Professor at the University of Dar-es-Salaam Nancy Odendaal University of KwaZulu-Natal Nicholas Low University of Melbourne Oren Yiftachel Ben Gurion University of the Negev Spatial planning practitioners have long encountered the multifaceted performances of informality, but have had few, if any, theoretical frames to which they could turn for understanding and guidance. This Roundtable, sponsored by the Sage journal, Planning Theory, recognises the importance of informality in a rapidly changing world. Informality matters to many actors in both the global North and South, though its manifestation occurs through a variety of forms. This Roundtable offers new configurations of planning theory discourse centred around the topic if informality. Speakers from a range of different planning | | — Roundtables —- contexts will present papers concerned with the links between planning and the range of informalities. They may be conceptual or may address the issue of how informality matters in particular settings and places. Questions for consideration include: How do social norms and legal/regulatory practices intersect to create informality? |.e. what are the material contexts of informality? How does informality affect the lives of citizens? . How does informality affect planning practices? How do communities act and ‘plan’ informally? What happens when efforts to introduce formal planning encounter informality? le what are the material processes of informality?What are the ways in which informality can reconfigure the ideas of state, civil society, power, communication, order, legibility, inclusion etc which are present in planning theory paradigms? RT_F CHANGING CONCEPTS OF SPACE AND PLACE IN SPATIAL PLANNING Convener: Nick Bailey University of Westminster Time/Venue Date: 14 July 2007 Room 7 Time: 9.00-11.00 Participants Simin Davoudi (Chair), University of Newcastle Nick Bailey, University of Westminster Greg Lloyd, University of Liverpool Neil Harris, University of Cardiff Huw Thomas, University of Cardiff Across Europe, the latter part of the twentieth century is considered as being the era when place and territory regained prominence as the focus of policy attention. The rediscovery of place and space was triggered by and reflected major changes in the political economy of Europe and other advanced industrial societies. For economic geographers this transition was articulated as the restructuring of economic organisation from Fordist mass production to post- Fordist flexible specialisation resulting in new cycles and patterns of space productions and consumptions. Within this context, the rediscovery of place is linked to its ‘added value’ to economic development. Place quality is seen as a new-found asset which can be drawn upon to ‘pin down’ the footloose | 42 a | ne Roundtables — | companies that are working in an increasingly competitive global market. Political scientists have portrayed this transition as a shift from the post-war Keynesian welfare state to more market and kinship oriented welfare systems. For them, the focus on territory is therefore linked to the significance of individual and localised forms of service delivery which have increasingly surpassed the nationally organised and universal forms of provision. Cultural analysts, on the other hand, highlighted the growing diversity of lifestyles, household types and interests as the signs of a transformation from modernism to post-modernism. Within this perspective, the importance attached to the quality of places and place identity arises from their association with what has come to be known as quality of everyday life. Another aspect of the transition is the changing scope and scale of environmental concerns to embrace not only amenities but also ecological concerns, with localities and local actions playing a central role in sustaining the carrying capacity of the biospheres and environmental systemsThis roundtable will explore the content and process of spatial planning in relation to the theoretical concepts of space and place as broadly defined by positivism, structuralism and post-structuralism or post-modernism. It will include contributions from the editors and co-authors of a book (Routledge, forthcoming) which will contain case studies of spatial planning in Wales, Scotland, Northern treland, Yorkshire and London. Topics for debate will include:* How the theoretical debates about space and place inform our understanding of space and place;* How space and place are conceived, defined, allocated and managed in spatial plans;* The multiple functions performed by spatial plans in relation to politically defined states, regions and metropolitan areas;* The ‘work’ done by spatial planning in creating (and reflecting) political agendas and relational geographies in relation to evolving systems of governance at national, regional and city levels. | | Roundtables — | | RT_G CLIMATE CHANGE, CITIES, AND URBAN PLANNING Convener: R. E. Pizarro, University of Sydney Time/Venue Date: 14 July 2007 Room 12 Time: 14.30-16.15 Participants Edward J. Blakely, University of Sydney Subhrajit Guhathakurta, Arizona Sate University James B. London, Clemson University John Lindsay Brandon, University of British Stephen M. Wheeler, University of California at Davis Lawrence Frank, University of British Columbia As consumers of energy and producers of greenhouse gas emissions, cities are at the center of the climate change crisis. Although the latest UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report implies that there must be a fundamental transition in the structure and functioning of cities to mitigate global warming, urban planning academics are still debating whether climate change should form the basis for an immediate and wholesale overhaul of planning orthodoxy or whether it is aesthetics, urban form, spatial politicaleconomy, or social issues what should guide our thinking about, and our prescriptions for, cities. Cities have other pressing problems too, to be sure. And, probably, many of those problems will continue to take precedence over climate change in the future (e.g. delivering low-income housing in a city of the Third World would surely score higher than climate change in the agenda of that city’s government). But climate change will nevertheless, sooner or later, affect decisions concerning all other problems in all cities. In this round table, we explore whether the threat of global warming and the reaction to it by all spheres of society (media, government, professional organizations, grassroots groups, research institutions, etc.) do mean a paradigm shift in urban planning with the environmental dimension at its core. The rising societal demands to adapt to, and mitigate, climate change seem to suggest that all other dimensions of planning may become secondary in importance to the problem of global warming. Simultaneously, the societal conditions that determine whether a system of thought becomes an accepted dominant paradigm suggest that those conditions are ripe for putting ecological thinking at the center of urban form and planning theory. This is evident in the prominence of climate change in the agendas of governments, popular media, professional organizations, community leaders, politicians, academic journals, universities, 44 —_ | | — Roundtables = | | international lay groups, funding for scientific research, and in various academies’ conferences and symposia. In tight of the above, two overriding questions animate this Round Table: how our thinking about cities should change. in light of climate change? (if it should change ait all), and, how would a new “climate change planning” fieid relate to other very pressing, yet different, urban problems such as poverty, segregation, injustice, or funding for infrastructure, for example. Would these other problems continue to take precedence and relegate climate change to a subservient position? Other questions that animate this Round Table are: 1. How strong is the connection between climate change and urbanism (as a way of life and as urban form)? 2. Should the role of cities in the global warming crisis give rise to a “general theory” of the city founded on the ecological paradigm? 3. Would adaptation to, and mitigation of, climate change split the urban field iinto corresponding separate normative theories? 4. Should the approach to climate change be different in cities of the “First World” than in those of the “Third World” (given the stark differences in their economic and social constitutions and institutional capacities to stop their contributions to the greenhouse effect)? 5. What is the role of planning educators in forming future generations of planners and designers vis-a-vis climate change? RT_H URBAN TRANSPORT PLANNING FOR THE XX! CENTURY:LEARNING FROM NAPLES AND CAMPANIA? Convener: Luca Bertolini, UvA- AMIDSt Angela Hull, University of the West of England Time/Venue Date: 12 July 2007 Room 12 Time: 14.30-16.15 Participants Ennio Cascetta, Campania Region Agostino Nuzzolo, University of Roma Tor Vergata Luca Bertolini, UvA-AMIDSt Angela Hull, University of the West of England — Roundtables —_— Theme: The city of Naples and the region of Campania are currently the theatre of one of Europe’s most ambitious urban transportation planning endeavours. In the roundtable the experience will be introduced and debated, both in its own merits and as a possible source of inspiration for others. Scientific relevance: There is broad consensus on the need to integrate transport and urban planning, but the question of how to achieve it in practice is far from settled. The Naples and Campania case seems to embody many of the principles current research points at, and to complement them with impressive achievements on the ground. But how much is this true? If it is, what are the conditions that have made it possible? If it is not, what are the still unanswered challenges? And finally, in which measure are the lessons applicable to other contexts? RT_|I TERRITORIAL ATTRACTIVENESS : CROSSING POINTS OF VIEW (Bilan des seminaires PUCA — Plan Urbanisme Construction et Architecture) Ministére de l’Equipement Frangais) Convener: Patrizia Ingallina Time/Venue Date: 14 July 2007 Room 5 Time: 9.00-11.00 Partecipants Chair: Michéle Tilmont, PUCA Permanent SecretaryCoordination: Jean Paul Blais Marcel Bazin (Sous Réserve), Territorial identity and attractiveness Mervi IIlmonen, Branding city image Patrizia Ingallina, Urban Project: A factor of attractiveness? Peter Newman, Cultural policies and attractiveness Didier Paris, Improvement of image and competitiveness Jungyoon Park, Consumption spaces and attractiveness Marcel Roncayolo, Questioning attractiveness Gaetano Fontana, DiCOTer Romain Bocognani, DiCOTer This Round Table presents the results from a series of four seminars organised by PUCA/CRETEIL in Paris under the heading ‘Attractivité des territoires, regards croisés’: Seminar 1. 13th February «Questions about Territorial Attractiveness». Seminar 2. 13th March «Attractiveness and Competitiveness: Territorial Assets, 46 a3 | | | | — Roundtables ed Marketing Approaches and Repercussions». Seminar 3. 3rd April «Attractiveness, Consumption Spaces and Activities». Seminar 4. 15th of May «Environmental Sustainability: Policies and Attractive Projects» The major cities of the world have been transformed in the two decades since the 1980s. City centres, skylines and waterfront developments now appear similar wherever you happen to be — from London’s Docklands to Tokyo’s waterfront development. The «middle-cities» of Europe, such as Vienna, Turin or Leipzig are also engaged in projects to develop their urban attractiveness. The first aim of a series of seminars about «Territorial Attractiveness», organised in the first half of 2007 by PUCA (Plan Urbanisme Construction et Architecture in the French Ministere de I’Equipement) is is to question the view that European cities are moving in the same direction, spurred along by the imperatives of globalization.Decisions made by politicians at the urban level have the potential to shape the future of the city. But many city leaders take a limited view and respond to globalization by focusing on the competitive qualities of their cities. This leads to a determination to create new developments aimed at capturing economic advantage in the new global economy. But at the same time urban politicians realise that they have to be sensitive to the needs and views of their local citizens.In France the idea of the «Urban Project» has become a process for managing these global/loca! tensions and an approach that can help shape strategic urban planning policy. Through its focus on city image and urban design, the Urban Project encourages the participation of citizens and different forms of urban governance. The PUCA seminars examined this concept with its focus on locality, image and social objectives, and connections to branding and the variable geometry of territorial and institutional scales shaped by a common project. The seminars took the debate beyond the French case to a wider discussion about the balance between economic development, territorial cohesion and different institutions of governance. The seminars tackled complex, overlapping questions. Questions of how these processes work to enhance the attractiveness of places? How do the cities attempt to change their image and why? What are the particular elements of amenity and consumption that create attractive places and what is the role of urban design? How does the new mixed use urban landscape of shopping, culture, leisures, etc. work? How do the mega-events (or media-events as the Olimpic Games) contribute to the creation of this new landscape of consumption?. Can, as Sharon Zukin does, we define all these forms of new urban space as landscapes of power? And how do reconcile efforts to enhance the image of a territory (city branding) with territorial cohesion and environmental sustainibility? In the seminars the analysis and debate moved from the context-shaping forces of economic globalization, through the processes of urban governance, to the agencies and interests shaping the specific form and content of strategic | | | | | Roundtables — planning to enhance the attractiveness of spaces in European cities. This round table draws together insights from the seminars and considers new directions for this debate about attractivité competitiveness and cohesion. RT_L ‘ ACOMMON EUROPEAN CORE CURRICULUM FOR PLANNING EDUCATION? Convener Anna Marson Time/Venue Date 13 July 2007 Room 4 time 11.30-13.00 Participants Jorge Amdam, Volda University College Marcel Bazin, Univ. of Reims Alex Fubini, Politecnico di Torino Anna Marson (chair), Universita IUAV di Venezia Michael Neuman Texas A&M University To explore the debate, within and across different European national and/or regional contexts, about the attitude to pursue or define — in a formal way or by mutual adjustments — some sort of a common core curriculum for planning education; and, if a common core curriculum exists, its qualifying contents Today the advanced implementation of the so-called Bologna Process, i.e. the process of harmonizing EU university education introducing a common system of education levels and credits, makes easier the comparison of different education systems, most of which so far have been restructured following the 3+2+Ill cycle model. Leaving apart the third cycle, and focusing on the fist two which are wider concerned with the education of planning professionals, a great variety of curricula ate currently to be found, where the previous five (or in some case four) years unique cycle was much more alike across different universities. In Italy, a recently set up working group of planning schools’ chair-men and - women has agreed that, without reducing the value of diverse schools’ cultural histories (Polytechnic culture, Architecture or Engineering alone, Agriculture and Forestry, rather than different contamination of these with Socio-economics etc.) and local identities, a common core curriculum should be agreed, especially for the first cycle. Currently the group is working on defining the amount of common credits and its contents. | Roundtables — Considering the Aesop mission (and acronym), its annual congress should be the right place where to make the point on this issue with an European perspective. Participants listed below are the Planning Education Track chairmen, plus the promoter of this Round table. Other fellows directly engaged in dealing with iis issue are warmly invited to contact Anna Marson before the Round Table ‘farts, so that their intervention can be conveniently arranged. es 9.00 - 11.30 Opening Session Key-note lectures 9.00 - 10.45 Parallel session/4 Roundtable B 9.00 - 10.45 Parallel session/7 Roundtables D, F, | Coffee break Coffee break 11.45 - 13.30 Parallel session/1 Roundtable A Roundtable C 11.15 - 13.00 Parallel session/5 Roundtable L 11.15-13.00 Parallel session/8 Roundtable E 13.45-14.45 13.15-14.15 13.15-14.15 Lunch Lunch Lunch 15.00 - 16.45 14.30-16.15 14.30-16.15 Parallel session/2 Parallel session/6 Roundtable H Parallel session/9 Roundtable G Coffee break Coffee break CONFERENCE SCHEDULE 17.15-19.00 16.30-19.30 16.45-19.15 Parallel session/3 Mobile workshops Closing session 19.00 19.00-20.30 21.00 rWecelecpotmioen Aesop General Assembly Conference diinner Study Tours weisboig Aep-Aq-Aeq pue ajnpeyos T2 T3 T4 JULY 12 Thursday 11.45 15.00 17.45 9.00 11.15 14.30 9.00 11.15 14.30 13.30 16.45 19.00 10.45 13.00 16.15 10.45 13.00 16.15 11 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 Epistemolo-| Politicaland| Methodolo- J General Reassessing Risk | Risk as Planning Risk gical social gical issues} approaches | Communica-| tassonomies} concept technologies mitigation approaches} relevance in| and ethical | suggested | tion in interpreting | shift: to face policy and to planning | risk challenges | by planning risk in implications | natural risk | planning theory assessment complexity | theory space on theory practices and planning i territorial agenda and European diversity 3.1 3.2 International Problem education solving in planning practice and education 4.1 Strategies for metropolis 2.2 Crossborder cooperation 4.2 The impact of development projects 2.3 Transnational learning and partnership 3.3 3.4 Teaching Educational environmentall. methods planning 43 4.4 Economic- Spatial spatial planning and development] economic in a glocal development environment 4.5 Issues from| peripheral regions 2.4 Territorial issues of environmen tal risks 1.6 Risk tassonomies§_ models and interpreting risk in processes space 2.6 2.7 Spatial EU policies visions and| and concepts programmes} 47 Developing local resources wei6olq Aep-Aq-Aeq pue ajnpayos vs TS T6 T7 T8 JULY 12 Thursday JULY 14 Saturday regions 8.1 Economic interests and Jand regulation 6.1 6.2 Planning Interand institutional governance} multilevel for city relations issues 8.2 Planning laws confronting general claims 6.3 6.4 Dealing with}. Civil risk in society planning and governance 7.1 T2 7.3 7.4 Housing in | Risk, Housing Social the process| exclusion, policy networking, of urban gentrification organization regeneratior| and related and action 8.3 8.4 Ecological Rules and issues and | policies land regulation 6.5 Ways of participation 7.5 Housing in the urban context 8.5 Innovations in planning law 6.6 Conflicts, communication and understanding 7.6 Sustainable housing 6.7 Researching new paths of governance rird Housing requirements 6.8 New profiles of 15.00 17.45 9.00 11.15 14.30 9.00 11.15 14.30 13.30 16.45 19.00 10.45 13.00 16.15 10.45 13.00 16.15 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 Cross- Culture, Planning Migration, Planning national diversity cities diversity and cultural learning in and the cityf. among and diversity in planning conflicting | integration the cities of visions and South values local actors 6.9 Integrating stakeholders, and planning tools weiboig Aep-Aq-Aeq pue ajnpeyos JULY 12 Thursday 11.45 15.00 17.45 9.00 11.15 14.30 9.00 11.15 14.30 13.30 16.45 19.00 10.45 13.00 16.15 10.45 13.00 16.15 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 Using risk National andj Problem Rebuilding | Meaning and as a tool of | local solving and | the value of urban identities urban fragmented | urban space design design city T10 11.1 Information management of natural hazards T11 112 10.1 Challenges of Mega Urban Transport projects room 12 11.2 Planning models and risk management 10.2 Mega urban * transport projects. Casestudies 11.3 People confronting natural hazards 10.3 Transport, social cohesion economic developmen room 12 11.4 Vulnerable and precarious cities 10.4 Sustainable transport modes/ best practices 12.1 Cultural policy and urban heritage 12.2 12.3 Policy of valorization room 12 Interpreting} The aim of historical sustainability preservation centers 10.5 10.6 10.7 Land use Lamd use Sustainable and and transport transport transport modes/ integration/ | integration/ | institutional approaches | tools issues 12.4 12.5 weiBolg Aep-Aq-Aeq pue ajnpauss Conflicting 9S 14.1 Safe sites and 114 settlements room 10 14.2 Landscapes 14.3 European ecological policy 14.4 14.5 14.6 Information | Sustainable! Institutional technology | cities responsibitools lities room 10 13.30 16.45 19.00 10.45 13.00 16.15 10.45 13.00 16.15 13.1 13.2 13.3 Planning the| Landscapes} Rural/urban rural/ at risk changing peripheral relations space 14.7 Land, landscape and energy 14.8 Challenges from climate changes wesBoig Aep-Aq-Aeqg pue ainpeyos |= : | | Schedule and Day-by-day Program tae | Thursday 12 July 2007 Venue: Auditorium Royal Continental Hotel Time: 9.00-11.30 Opening session Guido Trombetti, Rector of the University “Federico II” of Napoli Peter Ache, Aesop President Claudio Claudi de S. Mihiel, Chair of the Dept. of Urban design and planning, University “Federico II” Francesco D. Moccia, Chair of the Local Organizing Committee Keynote lectures Ignas Jonynas, European Commission DG ENV-A.3 Civil Protection European policy on risk prevention Alessandro Dal Lago, University of Genova Risk and the military planning of society hursday 12 July 2007, 11.45-13.30 1.1 Epistemological approaches to planning theory Chair HEATHER CAMPBELL Room 8 Re-discovering the Pragmatist tradition in planning thought Patsy Healey University of Newcastle Planning as a Design Science - Design Science as a Methodology Perry Hoetjes, Universiteit van Amsterdam - AMIDSt Theory versus practice — about setting up planning systems Thomas Dillinger UT Vienna Neo-Liberalism and the risk society Friedhelm Fischer University of Kassel How to deal with events in planning practices Gabriele Pasqui Polytechnic of Milano 2.1 EU territorial agenda and European diversity Chair SIMIN DAVOUDI Room 4 | | — Schedule and Day-by-day Program aan | | Making Sense of the ‘Territorial Agenda of the European Union’ Andreas Faludi Deift University of Technology European models of society, planning systems and planning cultures Vincent Nadin University of the West of England, Dominic Stead Delft University of Technology, Simin Davoudi Newcastle University The application of the ESDP and Its influences on European territorial governance Bas Waterhout Delft University of Technology, Dominic Stead Delft University of Technology Processes for territorial cohesion in terms of relational links: issues providing an infrastructure for regional spatial policies Alessia Cividin IUAV Venezia, Maria Adelaide Zito IUAV Venezia interdependent territorial systems’ as spatial units for cohesion policy: the case study of North-Western Italy Umberto Janin Rivolin Polytechnic of Torino 3.1 International education Chair MARCEL BAZIN Room 2 Transnational skills development for spatial planning: enhancing competitiveness, cohesion and balanced territorial development in Europe John McCarthy Heriot-Watt University Promotion of EA Education for Third Country Audience Paola Gazzola Department of Civic Design, University of Liverpool, Ingrid Belcakova Slovak University of Technology, Urmila Jha-Thakur Department of Civic Design, University of Liverpool, Ralf Aschemann Austrian Institute for the Development of Environmental Assessment (ANIDEA), Thomas B Fischer Department of Civic Design, University of Liverpool Unravelling the Paradox of the Internationalisation of Learning: implications for Planning Deborah Peel University of Liverpool, Andrea Frank University of Cardiff Sustainable Development in the Urban Region in Germany and the US: Dresden and Columbus as Examples. An international Postgraduate Module Bernhard Miller Technische Universitat Dresden, Hazel Morrow-Jones The Ohio State University, Columbus, Andreas Otto Technische Universitat Dresden Discourses and strategic visions: planning and the USA research David Perry University of Illinois Chicago, Frank Gaffikin Queens University Belfast aren Schedule and Day-by-day Program 4.1 Strategies for metropolis Chair FRANCO ARCHIBUGI Room6 in search of the Finnish Metropolis Peter Ache YTK-TKK, Helsinki What Exactly Is Progressive Planning In A Global City? Tom Angotti Hunter College/CUNY Capital city as refugee camp under neoliberal empire Pietro Calogero U.C. Berkeley Functional poly-centricity in the Mega-City Region of Munich Viktor Goebel Technical University of Munich, Chair for spatial development, Stefan Luthi Technical University of Munich, Chair for spatial developmen Making Mega-City Regions visible! - A programme to creating awareness for Mega-City Regions Agnes Forster TU Munich, Alain Thierstein TU Munich 6.1 Planning and governance for city regions Chair LOUIS ALBRECHTS Room 3 The strategic capacity of regions - A paradox? Nadav Haran University of Amsterdam induced versus Autonomous Behaviour in Regional Development ~ A Process Model for Regional Strategy Formation Thorsten Wiechmann Leibniz-institute of Ecological and Regional Development The concept of governance in metropolitan area management - the case of Metropolitan Areas in Poland Beata Banachowicz University of Lodz, Justyna Danielewicz University of Lodz Learning to innovate in metropolitan spatial planning: the case of Portugal Carlos Oliveira University of Porto, Isabel Breda-Vazquez University of Porto Institutional change or institutional conservatism in disguise? Assessing the institutionalisation of participatory planning initiatives in the City of Buenos Aires Laurence Crot London School of Economics 59 —_ | | z— Schedule and Day-by-day Program — | | 7.1 Housing in the process of urban regeneration Chair JUDITH ALLEN Room 5 Urban restructuring and social polarisation Silvia Lucciarini University of Roma Tre Understanding Patterns and Dynamics of Low Demand Neighbourhoods in industrially Restructuring Cities and the Use of Information Systems Graham Squires University of Manchester Sustainable residential development in major urban regeneration projects: delivering social mix and environmental quality within a market context Nikos Karadimitriou University College London, Roelof Verhage Université Lyon 2 Urban Regeneration Partnerships and the Limits of Urban Policies in Portugal Isabel Breda-Vazquez University of Porto, Paulo Conceigao University of Porto, Ruben Fernandes University of Porto 40 years of urban renewal and revitalization in the Netherlands and the shift from government dominance to governance with housing associations, illustrated with the exceptional case of Amsterdam Dick Schuiling University of Amsterdam 8.1 Economic interests and land regulations Chair WILLEM GM. SALET Room 7 Town Planning legislation and property investment in Spain over the last five years: A relationship to be pondered Eduardo Caceres University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria “WHO OWNS THE COMMONS” Common Lands and Interest Groups’ Activity: International Comparative Analysis Ravit Hananel Tel Aviv University Planning and stagnation in housing production: a changing context for Dutch provinces Willem Korthals Altes TU Delft, Danielle Groetelaers TU Delft Contractual governance and urban agreements for regeneration Greg Lloyd University of Liverpool Heritage, sustainable development and poverty reduction. Legal aspects in Guyana, Benin, Senegal and Laos Bernard Bizet ESSEC Business School, Paris | | | 60 —_ — Schedule and Day-by-day Program — 11.1 information management on natural hazards Chair ELISABETE SILVA Room 1 Nature Risk Management and Spatial Planning Activities in Austria Arthur Kanonier Vienna University of Technology internet GIS and Emergency Management: Challenges and Opportunities Elizabeth S. Chang Florida Atlantic University, David Prosperi Florida Atlantic University ‘ Analysis of dangerousness from landslides for urban sites by using GIS technology: a case study Salvatore Sessa University of Naples Federico II, Ferdinando di Martino University of Naples Federico !t, Michele Giordano University of Naples Federico Il, Barbara Cardone University of Naples Federico II Risks evaluation within Lisbon Metropolitan Area (LMA) urban sprawl! Elisabete Freire Technical University of Lisbon, José Crespo Technical University of Lisbon 14.1 Safe sites and settlements Chair PETTER NAESS Room 10 Opposing the risk of rural territories weakening by Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) of Programs of Rural Development Agata Spaziante Politecnico di Torino, Chiara Murano Politecnico di Torino Strategic Planning for Long-Term Flood Risk Management Gérard Hutter Leibniz Institute of Ecological and Regional Development (1OER), Dresden, Jochen Schanze Leibniz Institute of Ecological and Regional Development (IOER), Dresden Planning under conditions of risk Vesselina Troeva University of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy, Sofia Territorial planning for safe and liveable territory Marcella Samakovlija Politecnico di Milano, Sara Lodrini Politecnico di Milano Health and safety in territorial planning Sara Lodrini Polytechnic of Milano, Marcella Samakovlija Polytechnic of Milano — Schedule and Day-by-day Program —— ursday 12 July 2007, 15.00-16.45 1.2 Political and social relevance in risk assessment and planning Chair STEFANO MORONI Room 8 informality and rights: the ambiguities of power Vanessa Watson University of Cape Town Planning on Contested Ideological Terrain in Kabul, Afghanistan Pietro Calogero U.C. Berkeley Social concerns interpreted by the construct of ‘human needs’ in a quest to minimise social risks of new settlers Rania Abdel Galil University of Sheffield Contemporary planning in Serbia: Risky business in the risk society Tijana Dabovic Teaching Assistant, Dejan Djordjevic Associated Professor Naples and Barcelona, two cities at environmental risk: which trade-off between social and environmental equity? Floridea Di Ciompo Université d’Evry et CSTB Contemporary Planning Theory: Its Relevance to the “South” Tom Harper University of Calgary 2.2. Cross-border cooperation Chair ANDREAS FALUDI Room 4 Large cross-border projects: the experiences in Flanders and the Netherlands Jochem De Vries University of Amterdam Can cross-border cooperation be more inspired by the sustainable development vision? Igor Jogan IUAV Venezia The power of regional cooperation to foster cross-border neighbourship between Kdarnten and Friuli Venezia Giulia Beatrix Haselsberger Vienna University of Technolgy, Sandro Fabbro University of Udine European Territorial Co-operation 2007-2013: A new strategy and improved opportunities for the Austrian-Hungarian border region? Petra Hirschler Vienna University of Technology | | | 62 —_ — Schedule and Day-by-day Program — Preparing for Territorial Cooperation Olivier Sykes University of Liverpool 3.2 Problem solving in planning practice and education Chair ALEX FUBINI Room 2 Reflection on planning practices: an important aspect of planning education Raoul Beunen Land Use Planning Group, Wageningen University Janneke Hagens Land Use Planning Group,Wageningen University Jeroen Neuvel Land Use Planning Group,Wageningen University Dialogues between planning theory and practice — ‘Spatial Planning Network’ Werner Tschirk Vienna University of Technology, Andreas Voigt Vienna University of Technology, Helena Linzer Vienna University of Technology Teaching the Dialectics of Design to Problem Solving Practitioners lleana Apostol California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, Ken McCown California State Polytechnic University, Pomona A new approach to solving complex problems Christoph Hemberger University of Stuttgart, Jens-Peter Grunau University of Stuttgart, Walter Sch6nwandt University of Stuttgart, Katrin Voermanek University of Stuttgart, Riidiger von der Weth University of Applied Sciences, Dresden, Rinat Saifoulline University of Applied Sciences, Dresden Creativity, networks and openness - the potential value of an open source approach to support practitioners in planning for sustainability Joanne Tippett University of Manchester 4.2 The impact of development projects Chair ARTUR DA ROSA PIRES Room 4 Retail Repercussions: measuring the spatial impact of large-scale shopping formats § David Evers Netherlands Institute for Spatial Research (RPB) Shopping trends in the Netherlands an analysis of spatial patterns and transport implications Orit Rotem-Mindali OTB, TU-Delft From Impact Assessment to Territorial integrated Evaluation in spatial planning: a methodological proposal for new retail settlements Grazia Brunetta Polyechnic of Torino, Carlo Rega Polyechnic of Torino | | | | | | = Schedule and Day-by-day Program a | | The impact of Large - Scale Events for Greek Medium Sized Cities development. The case studies of Thessaloniki, Patras and loannina and comparisons with the German experience Evangelos Asprogerakas National Technical University of Athens, Triantafyllos Michailidis National Technical University of Athens, Thanos Papaioannou Hafencity University of Hamburg, Dimitrios Sofianopoulos National Technical University of Athens Public intervention as a means of shaping spatial development realities: experience in the Thessaloniki area Elisavet Thoidou, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki 5.1 Culture, diversity and the city Chair FRANCESCO LO PICCOLO Room 9 Everyday life as Resistance: Planning in Multicultural Society Tovi Fenster Tel Aviv University Contested public spaces in the multicultural cities Alessia Ferretti University of Roma “La Sapienza’ Linguistic diversity and the city Diarmait Mac Giolla Chriost Cardiff University, Huw Thomas Cardiff University Sounds and screechs between planning and multicolour identities Anna Ursida University of Catania The Place of Others Lucia Nucci University of Roma Tre, Marluci Menezes LNEC — National Laboratory of Civil Engineering, Lisbon Judith Allen University of Westminster, Tony Lloyd-Jones University of Westminster, Lia Vasconcelos New University of Lisbon 6.2 Interistitutional multilivel relationships Chair ALESSANDRO BALDUCCI Room 3 Dealing with Risk: Achilles’ heel of Planning? Louis Albrechts KU Leuven New governance effects of an eu environmental policy Dilek Unalan Cardiff University Good practice’ in collaborative planning: tensions between levels of institutional achievement Diana MacCallum GURU, University of Newcastle upon Tyne | | | 64 —_ — Schedule and Day-by-day Program — Network governance in contested urban landscapes Torill Nyseth University of Tromsa Strategic governance approach for institutional coordination and citizen Participation in planning for public transportation: A Case of Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania Ahmad Kanyama Royal Institute of Technology of Stockholm 7.2 Risk, exclusion, gentrification and related issues Chair DAVE SHAW Room 5 Forms of housing of the Romany minority in Czech towns and cities. Examples - the City of Brno, Vsetin and residential area Chanov in Most Maxmilian Wittmann Technical University of Brno Risk and security in Singapore high-rise Belinda Yuen National University of Singapore Gentrification Theory and ‘Risk Society’ Andrejs Skaburskis Queen’s University Canada Construction and impact of indicators of inclusion in the the risk activity of monitoring Angela Digrandi ISTAT, Pasquale Cimmino ISTAT, Germano Monteleone Social exclusion and urban policy in European cities: combining ‘Northern’ and ‘Southern’ European perspectives Frank Moulaert Newcastle University, Enrica Morlicchio Univ Frederico ll, Lucia Cavola ITER, Napoli 8.2 Plannign laws confronting general claims Chair RACHELLE ALTERMANN Room 7 Dealing with uncertainty in the Dutch retail market: a property rights approach Erwin van der Krabben Radboud University Nijmegen How Practice Shapes the Law: The Right to be Heard in England the Netherlands and Israel , Dafna Carmontechnion- Israel institute of Technology, Rachelle Alterman Technion - Israel Institute of Technology Discourse, doctrine and state power in the survival of Sydney’s urban consolidation policy Glen Searle University of Technology Sydney | | 65 —_ = Schedule and Day-by-day Program — | | Planning in the dark: the lack of transparency in urban land management in Mexico Adriana Fausto Brito University of Guadalajara, Edith Rosario Jiménez Huerta, Heriberto Cruz Solis 10.1 The challenges of Mega Urban Transport Projects: international views Chair ANGELA HULL Room 12 Coping with complexity in mega projects: linking strategic choices and operational decision making Luca Bertolini UvA — AMIDSt, Willem Salet UvA - AMIDSt Urban Mega-Transport Projects: Ecosystem and Human Health Risks Nicholas Low University of Melbourne Transportation Planning in France and the challenge of sustainable development: actors, tools and methods Stéphanie Leheis Latts/ENPC, France Mega-Urban-Transport-Projects’ response to the vision of sustainable development: The challenge of social cohesion George Kaparos University of Thessaly, Pantelis Skayannis University of Thessaly The Development of Indoor Walkways into the Public Domain in Toronto and Montreal Through Public- Private Partnerships David Amborski Ryerson University 11.2 Planning models and risk management Chair DINO BORRI Room 1 Nature Risk Management and Spatial Planning Activities in Austria Arthur Kanonier Vienna University of Technology Extending Decision Map Concept to Support spatial decision making in urban planning Salem Chakhar Lamsade-Paris Dauphine, Costanzo Procaccini University of Naples, Lamsade-Paris Dauphine, Clara Pusceddu Universita degli Studi di Sassari Vulnerability as a “core” part of risk analyses supporting land use planning Andrea Ceudech University Federico I! of Napoli, Silvia Cozzi Polytechnic of Milano — Schedule and Day-by-day Program ie | | | Towards a risk informed planning process: the main outcomes of the Armonia Project Adriana Galderisi University of Napoli Federico II, Scira Menoni Polytechnic of Milano The meaning of flood risk information in spatial planning Jeroen Neuvel Wageningen University, Adri Van den Brink Wageningen University 14.2 Landscapes Chair ROBERTO GAMBINO Room 10 From landscape ecological model to landscaping action Burghard Meyer University of Dortmund, Ralf Grabaum OLANIS Expert Systems GmbH Leipzig Dealing with risk at the local level : new tools for risk management in France Marcel Bazin Univ. of Reims, Florine Ballif Univ. of Reims Balancing intrinsic landscape value and the impacts of new technologies Jung Jin Park The University of Sheffield, Anna Jorgensen The University of Sheffield, Carys Swanwick The University of Sheffield Paul Selman Department of Landscape, The University of Sheffield Nature Conservation and Urban Development Control in the National Portuguese Planning System - a new impetus against an old praxis? Teresa Fidelis University of Aveiro, David Sumares University of Aveiro Stakes and Challenges in Organization and Promotion The Romania National Parks Viorel Chirita University of Suceava Schedule and Day-by-day Program — Thursday 12 July 2007, 17.45-19.00 1.3 Methodological issues and ethical challenges Chair ERNEST ALEXANDER Room 8 Methodological and ethical challenges in Spatial Planning Research Patsy Healey Newcastel University Operationalizing holism in Planning Analysis Frank Moulaert Newcastel University Reaserching planning in academia and practice: a review of methods and approaches in recent planning research Neil Harris University of Wales 2.3 Trans-national learning and partnership Chair SANDRO FABBRO Room 4 Transnational Learning in European Cooperation Projects Verena Hachmann Heriot-Watt University Mutual learning between European research and territorial cooperation: The issue of urban-rural relationships Wil Zonneveld Delft University of Technology, Dominic Stead Delft University of Technology Challenges and experiences of the Interreg IIIB project Planners Network for Central and South-East Europe (PlaNet CenSE) Gabriele Tatzberger Austrian Institute for Regional Studies and Spatial Planning, Friedrich Schindegger Retired from Austrian Institute for Regional Studies and Spatial Planning The Sustainable Communities Agenda - from EGAN to Europe Neil Evans Leeds Metropolitan University The pursuit of shared, sustainable & inclusive economic growth, social integration and territorial cohesion through application of the South African National Spatial Development Perspective (NSDP) in the municipal sphere — prospects for the EU? Mark Oranje University of Pretoria, Elsona van Huyssteen Council for Scientific and Industrial Research of South Africa 68 —_ Schedule and Day-by-day Program oo 3.3 Teaching environmental planning Chair J@RGEN AMDAM Room 2 Hogional Plan and Design to Rebuild a Sustainable Louisiana Gulf Coast Michael Neuman Texas A&M University Flanning for Healthy People/Healthy Places: Lessons From Mid-20th Global Discourse Century t flen Shoshkes Portland State University, Sy Adler Portland State University A project for Barriera del Bosco Salvatore Messina LabPEAT, Carmelo Tomaselli LabPEAT, Anna Ursida LabPEAT Assessing Student Perceptions of Active Learning in a Landscape Planning Curriculum Patricia Machemer Michigan State University, Pat Crawford Michigan State University (Re)-valorising the role of urban planners within the public sector: rising to the challenge of environmental sustainability Wendy Steele Griffith University 4.3 Economic-spatial development in a glocal environment Chair PETER ACHE Room 6 Spatial quality risk globalization? - impacts of international real estate development on local projects and building culture Lars Niemann University Dortmund Global Risk as a Local Issue. Industrial Growth Paths in the Zhujiang Delta (China) Francesca Frassoldati CRUTA-University of Ferrara The global iron prize causes the movement of a town - Uncertainties and risks in planning policy and practice Kristina L Nilsson Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Planning for local innovation strategies in the global knowledge-driven society Artur Rosa Pires University of Aveiro, Carlos Rodrigues University of Aveiro, Nuno Sobral University of Aveiro Local-global interactions: silent practices of change in a slum upgrading project in india Laura Grassini Polytechnic of Bari 69 —_ Schedule and Day-by-day Program — 5.2 Cross-national learning in planning Chair HUW THOMAS Room 9 Cross-national lesson drawing for planning ~ pitfalls and possibilities Robin Hambleton University of Illinois, Chicago Urban competitiveness - branding or planning? Milan (Italy) and Chicago (US) as case studies Glenda Garelili University of Illinois, Chicago Thoughts on Anglo-American hegemony in planning scholarship: Do we read each others work? Bruce Stiftel Florida State University, Tallahassee, Chandrima Mukhopadhyay Florida State University Reflecting upon cross-national learning in planning Alessandro Balducci , Polytechnic of Milano 6.3 Dealing with risk in planning and governance Chair ENRICO GUALINI Room 3 Conceptions of the city-region Simin Davoudi Newcastle University Strategic Planning and Strategic Spatial Planning - Mapping Management and Planning Research Gérard Hutter Leibniz-Institute of Ecological and Regional Development (IOER), Dresden Participation to Restrain the Social Risks? Gesa Witthoeft Vienna University of Technology, Jens S. Dangschat Vienna University of Technology Socio-territorial intervention in critical neighbourhoods Lia Vasconcelos New University of Lisbon Patching the way for public sector improvement: technological upgrade, institutional change, and professional development Pinhanez Monica MIT - Massachusetts Institute of Technology Strategic Project governace as Government Instrument Alain Motte Université Paul Cézanne Aix-Marseille III | 70 —_ —_ Schedule and Day-by-day Program 7.3 Housing policy Chair ANDREI SKABURSKIS Room 5 Mixed tenure communities Nick Bailey University of Westminster Developing Mixed Tenure Estates in England and Scotland - what prospects for reducing social exclusion? Anna Haworth University of Westminster The new housing policy: public policies and house models in Italy Ignazia Pinzello University of Palermo Laura Colonna Romano University of Palermo, Annalisa Giampino University of Palermo, Paola Marotta University of Palermo, Vincenzo Todaro University of Palermo, Giada Bini University of Palermo The importance of public housing peripheries in the processes of city regeneration: the Napoli case-study Giovanni Laino University of Napoli “Federico Il’, Daniela De Leo University of Napoli “Federico II” Private initiatives in housing developments in The Netherlands and the role of directed urban design Alexandra Tisma The Netherlands institute for Spatial Research, Ed Dammers The Netherlands Institute for Spatial Research Wiebke Klemm The Netherlands Institute for Spatial Research 8.3 Ecological issues in land requlation Chair GREG LLOYD Room 7 Issues in land-use regulation: the fact of complexity and the values of the liberal-democratic ideal Stefano Moroni Politecnico di Milano Property Profitability Optimization and Risk Management: when planning considerations are included in the calculus of real estate finance property Profitability “ Xuan Deng University of Cambridge, Elisabete Silva University of Cambridge Fat, fried, frightened Dan Tarlock Chicago-Kent college of Law Planning the coastal zone: A Conflict between The Regional Administration of Sardinia (Italy) and the City of Sinnai Analyzed through Contingent Valuation and Multicriteria Analysis Corrado Zoppi University of Cagliari | | 71 — Schedule and Day-by-day Program = 10.2 Mega Urban Transport Projects and case studies Chair LUCA BERTOLINI Room 12 The Use of Pre-Hypothesis Based Information Gathering: Channel Tunnel Rail Link Case Study (CTRL) Philip Wright Omega Centre, Bartlett School of Planning, UCL Power values between organisations delivering mega transport projects, sustainable development, urban regeneration and international mega events Yen-Ning Tseng University College London Uncertainty, Risk and Complexity in decision-making and planning a Mega Transport Project: the Channel Tunnel Rail Link, UK Richard Oades Omega Centre, Bartlett School of Planning, UCL HST and polycentric regional development of Catalonia Jaume Feliu Unitat de Geografia Universitat de Girona The Role of Waterbus in Sustainable Urban Transport: A case study in Cardiff Chris Yewlett Cardiff University 11.3 People confronting natural hazards Chair FRANCESCO SELICATO Room 1 Civic engagement in a complex world Joris Ernest Van Wezemael University of Zurich, Jean Hillier GURU University of Newcastle upon Tyne Risk perception as a factor for preparedness of population settled in risk areas Juan Demerutis Arenas University of Guadalajara Risk and Trust in Carpool Websites Usage David Bornstein Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Pnina O. Plaut Technion Israel Institute of Technology On demand service for aerial monitoring of environment and territory Luigi Di Prinzio University IUAV of Venice, Silvia Dalla Costa University IUAV Venezia, Stefano Picchio IUAV Venezia Complexity science, planning and ICT Giovanni Rabino Politechnic of Milan, Sylvie Occelli IRES - Istituto di Ricerche Economico Sociali del Piemonte 72 —_ — Schedule and Day-by-day Program aan 14.3 European ecological policy Chair AGATA SPAZIANTE Room 10 Sustainable urban development and the challenge of policy integration. An assessment of planning tools for integrating spatial and environmental planning in the Netherlands Hens Runhaar University of Utrecht, Peter Driessen University of Utrecht, Laila Soer University of Utrecht Implementation and integration of EU environmental policies, Cutting the Gordian Knot of EU environmental directives Wim van der Knaap Wageningen University, Land Use Planning group, Raoul Beunen Wageningen University, Land Use Planning group Progress in the European Union urban environmental agenda; Towards Liveable Cities? Christian Zuidema University of Groningen Ecological network and planning instruments in Italy and Spain. Case studies and comparison Filippo Schilleci University of Palermo, Dario Gueci University of Palermo, Vincenzo Todaro University of Palermo The role of Brownfield redevelopment in urban planning Tiziana Cianflone APAT Friday 13 July 2007, 9.00-10.45 1.4 General approaches suggested by complexity Chair PATSY HEALEY Room9 Plan(e) Speaking: a multiplanar theory of spatial planning and governance Jean Hillier GURU, Newcastle University ideologies of Certainty in a Risky Reality Michael Gunder University of Auckland From the Green Revolution to the Gene Revolution in India: 1965-2007 Asmita Bhardwaj Cornell University = 73 —_ | . | Schedule and Day-by-day Program From Masterplan to Mastermind Hans Knikkink PPMC Hans Knikkink BVBA Plan it without a condom! Benjamin Davy University of Dortmund 3.4 Educational methods Chair MICHAEL NEUMAN Room 2 Work-based Learning and Planning Education: Experiences from long-term placements in UK Andrea Frank Cardiff University Educational Challenges regarding Rural Planning and Development Jorgen Amdam Volda University College Toward Lifelong Planning Education in Latvia Jekabs Trusins Riga Technical Univeresity, Inese Trusina Riga Technical University Educating Positive, Creative, Confident Practitioners: “Raising up the Good” Marilyn Higgins Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh Lifelong educational projects on brownfields-the results and the experience Jana Pletnicka V‘B-TU Ostrava, Frantisek Kuda V‘B-TU Ostrava 4.4 Spatial planning and economic development Chair KRISTINA L NILSSON Room 6 The multilevel systemic consistency of urban planning: a tool for the European ‘cohesion policy’ Franco Archibugi Planning Studies Center, Roma Strategic planning for new challenges Wolfgang Jung University of Stutigart, Walter Sch6nwandt University of Stuttgart, Johannes Bader University of Stuttgart, Juri Jacobi University of Stuttgart Regional disparities as an aspect of regional strategic planning Barbara Vojvodikova ATACO s.r.0., Martin Vojvodik ATACO s.r.o. Development dynamics and social change in Athens under globalization as a driver for new planning instruments Minas Angelidis National Technical Universirty of Athens, Gabriella Karka ERGASTERIA SA- Athens —= Schedule and Day-by-day Program —— The facts that fit: knowledge, planning evidence and policy-making in the ‘new’ English system Christine Lambert Faculty of the Built Environment, UWE, Bristol, UK Shrinkage — The Achilles’ hell of spatial planning Gerlind Weber Bodenkultur University 5.3 Planning cities among conflicting visions and values Chair GLENDA GARELLI Room 8 “Contested Communities” at Work: the Regeneration of the Spitalfields Area in East London Paola Briata Polytechnic of Milano Planning “with” minorities in the Palermo Local Agenda 21 participatory process: negotiating ethical and political commitments Francesco Lo Piccolo University of Palermo Young people and planners: how do they communicate? Ulrich Doenitz Cardiff University Planning and traveller-gypsies in the uk: towards more Progressive practice Geraint Ellis Queen’s University, Belfast, Catharine McWhirter Community Technical Aid, Belfast Finding Common Ground in the Galilee David Epstein University of Michigan, Yaakov Garb The Arava Institute for Environmental Studies, Heve Eilot 6.4 Civil society Chair DIDIER PARIS Room 3 Civic Governmentality: The Politics of Inclusion in Mumbai and Beirut Ananya Roy University of California, Berkeley The Desire Called Civil Society Kanishka Goonewardena University of Toronto Civil society in city-region: A chance for new structures? Elke Becker Technical University, Berlin, Enrico Gualini Technical University, Berlin | | Schedule and Day-by-day Program = Citizen participation and institutional ambiguity. A Case of Inner City Traffic Planning Process, Tampere, Finland Markus Laine City of Helsinki Urban facts / Head of Urban Research Unit, Helena Leino University of Tampere, Minna Santaoja University of Tampere Society as “mobility”: implications for planning, policies and governance Valeria Fedeli Polytechnic of Milano 7.4 Social networking, organization, and action Chair ENRICA MORLICCHIO Room 5 The Liberal Logic of Voluntarism: A New Approach to Managing Homelessness in San Francisco Stacey Murphy University of California Social partnerships at risk? Understanding institutional and strategic dynamics within Dutch local partnerships aimed at realising area-based arrangements for housing, care and social support Peter Hendrixen Radboud University Nijmegen Managing Risk: dealing with ‘dangerous’, deviant’ and ‘disreputable’ places and people Pauline Card Cardiff University 25 years later. Inhabiting the Post-earthquake city Fabrizia Ippolito University of Calabria Housing, facilities and life stories in the “ZEN dimension” Giulia Bonafede University of Palermo, Francesca Triolo University of Palermo 8.4 Rules and Policies Chair EDOARDO CACERES Room 7 Reinventing institutional arrangements for metropolitan government and strategic planning in Auckland Ali Memon Lincoln University, New Zealand, Tom Davies Lincoln University, Tom Fookes Environment Court, New Zealand From Plan-making to Policy Packages. The shaping of partnership processes in the planning instrument of ‘development area’ in Germany, Britain and Finland Kimmo Kurunmaki University of Helsinki Property rights and urban regeneration | | 76 —_ | | | — Schedule and Day-by-day Program — Edwin Buitelaar Netherlands Institute for Spatial Research / Radboud University Nijmegen, Arno Segeren Netherlands Institute for Spatial Research Transformation of Planning Process in Turkey After 1980's: Law, Instutional Regulation and Interventions in Urban Planning Pervin Seno! Karadeniz Technical University From the social reporting to the participatory budget. The cumiana’s experience. Luisa Ballari Polytechnic ofTorino, Daniela Ciaffi Polytechnic ofTorino 10.3 Transport, social cohesion and economic development Chair NICK BOGIAZIDES Room 12 Transportation Planning and Urban Regeneration Fabrizio Giulietti Roma Tre University Mobility systems for the regeneration of the contemporary city Paola Marotta University of Palermo Pre-project appraisal in Istanbul and London Caroline Fabianski UCL-Omega Centre Towards an Urban Regeneration Index of the Impact of Proposed Transport Networks in Small and Medium Sized Cities Theodora Papatheochari University of Thessaly, Nick Bogiazides University of Thessaly Sustainable urban transports policy transfer in central and Eastern Europe Dominic Stead TU Delft, Martin de Jong TU Delft 11.4 Vulnerable and precarious cities Chair GIOVANNI RABINO Room 1 information technologies for planning in hydro - geological risk areas Francesco Selicato Polytechnic of Bari, Grazia Maggio Polytechnic of Bari, Mirella Nardelli Polytechnic of Bari The precarious City. “Case minime” Giovanni La Varra Politecnico di Milano The global urban risk understanding, an expeditious method for urban systems Romano Fistola University of Sannio -_— Schedule and Day-by-day Program — Exploiting municipal data infrastructures for vuinerability assessment Veronica Botero ITC/UU, Richard Sliuzas ITC, Henk Ottens Utrecht University Knowledge framework” of Po river delta Silvia Castelli University IUAV of Venice, Luigi Di Prinzio University IUAV of Venice 14.4 Information technology tools Chair TERESA FIDELIS Room 10 Integrating geo-information and expert judgment to support environmental decisions Davide Geneletti University of Trento, Corrado Diamantini University of Trento, Rocco Scolozzi University of Trento Geographic Information Systems for the Management of Actions of Recovery in urban centres Yuri Innauzzi University of Cagliari, Matteo Simula University of Cagliari Community indicators for community-based natural resource management Michael Hibbard University of Oregon The Interdisciplinary integration of Urban Knowledge: Challenges in Crossing Borders Elena Dimitrova University of Architecture, Civil engineering & Geodesy, Sofia Friday 13 July 2007, 11.15-13.00 1.5 Reassessing communication in planning theory Chair JEAN HILLIER Venue: Room 9 Dual Planning Theory: Lethal and Communicative? Tore Sager Norwegian University of Science and Technology Balancing on a jagged crest. Cues for a spatial communicative planner Laura Lieto University of Napoli “Federico II” Control and media information in public spaces Claudia Romano University of Pavia | 78 —_ Schedule and Day-by-day Program Trust and Governance in Planning Maicolm Tait University of Sheffield, Carsten Jahn Hansen Aalborg University The bridge to Gretna: Three faces of a case James Throgmorton University of lowa 4.5 Issues from peripheral regions Chair TOM ANGOTTI Room 6 The Political Economy of Development and Apparel Production in Cambodia Sylvia Nam University of California, Berkeley Promoting local and regional development through the application of Competitiveness Clusters’ concept: the Portugal case Eduardo Castro University of Aveiro, Gongalo Santinha University of Aveiro, Carlos Esteves University of Aveiro The Role of Multinationals in Innovation and Creativity in Asian Cities Larissa Muller University of Calgary Small towns as drivers of the rural economy Stuart Farthing UWE, Bristol Alleviating Poverty and Greening the City: Women Rag Pickers of Mumbai Hemalata C. Dandekar Arizona State University, Sulakshana Mahajan Rachana Sansad Academy of Architecture, Mumbai 5.4 Migration, diversity and integration Chair GERAINT ELLIS Room 4 Cross-cultural communication policy and the implications for spatial Planning: toward planning for intercultural areas, Alessia Cividin UAV Venezia Culture is to Nation as Multicultural is to Multinational? Simone Abram University of Sheffield Transit cities at Europe’s Doors, catalysts for unwanted migrants Giovanna Marconi IUAV, Venezia Residential paths of stranger migrants in Naples, Maria Teresa Sepe University of Napoli “Federico II” Schedule and Day-by-day Program —+ The multiethnic issue: housing needs and social and urban integration. The case of the city of Cagliari (Sardinia, Italy) Ginevra Balletto University of Cagliari, Alessandra Milesi University of Cagliari, Noemi Meloni University of Cagliari, Matteo Lecis Cocco Ortu University of Cagliari 6.5 Ways of participation Chair DAVID LUDLOW Room 3 Relevance and limits of children participation in local town planning project Loic VoluerUniversity of Reims The impact of network relations in local regimes on the adoption of youth participation in spatial planning Stefaan Tubex Hogeschoo! Ghent, Filip De Rynck Hogeschool Ghent, Filip Coussée Ghent University Citizen participation as a way to establishing face validity John Gaber Auburn University, Auburn Dreaming the rational plan. Participatory planning practices in Sao Paulo Nilton Torres University of Sao Paulo “Hope in the dark”. Effects of citizens’ participation in urban decisions Gilda Berruti University of Napoli “Federico II” 7.5 Housing in the urban context Chair GUSEPPE MAZZEO Room 5 Outskirts Barbara Lino University of Palermo The need of the city: an Integrated Proposal for the Suburbs Upgrading and the Living Discomfort Reduction Eleonora Giovene di Girasole University of Napoli “Federico II” ls the intensification of residential development in London sustainable? Suzy Nelson University of Westminster Housing stock transfer in Wales: a regeneration perspective Robert Smith Cardiff University From Public Housing to Regulated Public Environments: The Redevelopment of Public Housing in San Francisco Jane Rongerude University of California, Berkeley | | | 80 —_ —_ Schedule and Day-by-day Program — 8.5 Innovations in planning laws Chair CORRADO ZOPPI Room 7 Planning by contracts? Principles, rationalities and consequences of public contracting Leonie B. Janssen-Jansen Universiteit van Amsterdam, Willem G.M. Salet Universiteit van Amsterdam, Menno van der Veen Delft University of Technology Balancing regional developments in order to improve the overall quality in urban regions: the case of the North Wing Tragedy of the Offices Leonie Janssen-Jansen Universiteit van Amsterdam Responsive Planning Policies for Closed Condominiums Sara Santos Cruz CITTA- FEUP Dutch Planning Paul Zoete Utrecht University, Tejo Spit Utrecht University Legally binding land use rules throughout Western Europe Demetrio Mun’oz Gielen, Delft Technical University 9.1 Using risk as a tool of urban design Chair CRISTINA BIANCHETTI Room 2 The contemporary production of central public spaces within design-related partnerships. Incentive Planning - Service Concessions - Risk Transfer Sabine Knierbein Bauhaus-University Weimar Embracing the Factors of Risk: Planning for User-Owned Urban Spaces Nabil Kamel Arizona State University Mixed-Use Local High Streets: a Low-Risk Environment for the Future Marion Roberts University of Westminster, Peter Jones University College London Security and new density: planning metropolitan sprawl Michelangelo Russo University of Napoli “Federico |!” Risk Abuse. Metropolitan Sprawl and Metropolitan Risk: a Mediterranean Case Study Giuseppe Guida University of Napoli “Federico II” | Schedule and Day-by-day Program — 10.4 Sustainable transport modes — in search of best practices Chair CHRIS YEWLETT Room 12 Best practises: Relocation of municipality administration Kathrine Strommen NTNU No Such Thing as a Free Spot: Demand Management Strategies for Parking Andrea Broaddus European Centre for Transport and Logistics Position of pedestrians (endangered species) in Czech Cities Karel Schmeidler Transport Research Center Development of the road traffic safety in the Czech Republic Emil Drapela Transport Research Center, Karel Schmeidler Transport Research Center Potential accessibility layer. A policy support tool for sustainable urban mobility. An application to Oporto Cecilia Silva University of Porto 12.1 Cultural policy and urban heritage Chair GIORGIO PICCINATO Room 1 Cultural Heritage vs Commerce: Is Spatial Planning a Solution? Veli Ortacesme Istanbul Technical University, M. Selcuk Sayan Istanbul Technical University, Emrah Yildirim Istanbul Technical University Image city like cultural heritage Eva-Leticia Ortiz National University of Mexico Culture in local development since 70’s: which kind of evolution? Antonino Porrello IUAV Venezia, Enrico Tommarchi IUAV Venezia Conservation vs. Regeneration? Case of European Capital of Culture 2010 Istanbul Initiative Zeynep Gunay Istanbul Technical University The Role of Culture in Promoting Self-confident Cities. Learning from Naples Maria Federica Palestino University of Napoli “Federico II” 14.5 Sustainable cities Chair GERT DE ROO Room 10 — Schedule and Day-by-day Program — Growth, decoupling and urban unsustainability Petter Naess Aalborg University Challenging sustainable urban development in the Palestinian Cities Lubna Shaheen Birzeit University Integration and salience in Strategic Environmental Assessment of urban plans in Italy: a metaevaluation of current practices’ effectiveness Carlo Rega Polytechnic of Torino, Alessandro Bonifazi Polytechnic of Bari Just urban form * Ulrika Gunnarsson KTH, Mattias Héjer KTH Greenbelts to Control Urban Sprawl in Ontario, Canada Amal K. Ali Salisbury University Friday 13 July 2007,14.30-16.15 1.6 Risk tassonomies, interpreting risk in the space Chair JAMES THROGMORTON Room 9 Revisiting the City as a Rotation of Risk Undertaking, Risk Transfer and Risk Management Processes - The Example of Public Places Kalliopi Sapountzaki Harokopion University of Athens Towards a rhizomatic ecophilosophy for economic development James Rowe University of Auckland Individual risk of cities implicated in territorial cohesion; how to measure it and how to predict it Tadeusz Zipser Wroclaw University of Technology, Wawrzyniec Zipser Wroclaw University of Technology The Risks in Expropriation processes: data concerns, plan-led systems, and social-economic justice Elisabete Silva University of Cambridge, Miguel Fernandes CENOR Views, Visions and Visibilities: Building Place Reflexivity into Planning Theory Meredith Drake Reitan University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Tridib Banerjee University of Southern California, Los Angeles 83 —_ Schedule and Day-by-day Program se 2.4 Territorial aspects of environmental risks Chair NICOLE SCHAFER Room 4 The Future of Europe as a Risk Society Ed Dammers Netherlands Institute for Spatial Research, David Evers Netherlands Institute for Spatial Research, Aldert de Vries Dutch Ministery of Spatial Planning, Housing, and the Environment First results from SCENARIO project: Images of Europe at risk Daniela Molinari Polytechnic of Milano, Scira Menoni Polytechnic of Milano Risks’ as justification and challenge for European territorial co-operation Ulrich Graute INTERREG III B CADSES Joint Secretariat Intertwinement of spatial and water policy in European regions; dealing with the risk of flooding Robbert Biesbroek, Wim van der Knaap Making sense of Latium: weaving future’s hypothesis Pietro Elisei University of Roma Tre, Giovanni Pineschi University of Roma “La Sapienza”, consultant for BIC Lazio 4.6 Development models and processes Chair HEMALATA C. DANDEKAR Room 6 New Urban Economies and the Greek cities: the case study of the post-Olympic Athens Aspa Gospodini University of Thessaly From urban managerialism to urban neoliberal entreprenurialism: new Strategies for the city Silvia Infusino Polytechnic of Torino Save our garages. Development, private profit and public interest in urban regeneration Elena Besussi University College London A skills dividend for sustainable communities? Recent debates about the skills needed to deliver ‘successful places’ across Europe Kevin Thomas Leeds Met University, Steve Littlewood Leeds Met University Globalization and mega-transport projects. Emerging trends and challenges Harry Dimitriou, Omega Centre, UCL | | =— Schedule and Day-by-day Program —_ | | 5.5 Planning and cultural diversity in the cities of the South Chair SIMONE ABRAM Room 8 Planning as a possible way to prevent land conflicts in the municipalities of Niger: limits and prospects Elena Gagnor Polytechnic of Torino Multiculturalism in Maputo: from society to physical spaces Fabio Vanin IUAV Venezia Mexico city: the risk city in risk society Noemi Leon Gomez Institut d’Urbanisme de Paris 200.000 muslim, hindu, catholic and buddist homes.The post- tsunami recontruction in Sri Lanka Matilde Cassani Planning in Multicultural Societies (Birzeit old town -Study Case) Raed Najjar Farah Social Foundation, Beirut, Jamal Amro Birzeit University, Jerusalem 6.6 Conflicts, communication and understanding Chair KANISHKA GOONEWARDENA Room 3 Community conflicts in the planning process: innovative social practices in the constitution of public good Grazia Maggio Polytechnic of Bari The residential advisory board in Ferrara: partecipation, conflicts and institutional change in a public private policy making arena Marco Vani |UAV Venezia Transferring conflict assessment and mediation practices over disparate planning contexts Jonna Kangasoja University of Helsinki and the City of Helsinki, Lasse Peltonen Helsinki University of Technology, Sari Puustinen Helsinki University of Technology Flexible communication support in the urban planning processes with the object-oriented based analysis Chang-Yu Lin Kaiserslautern University The impact of ePlanning Systems on Public Participation in Planning Processes Sonja Knapp HFT Stuttgart, Yun Chen University of Salford Schedule and Day-by-day Program oe 7.6 Sustainable housing Chair ANNA HAWORTH Room 5 Urban sprawl, gated communities and other territorial micro-organizations: because they are not sustainable Giuseppe Mazzeo CNR-University of Napoli “Federico II” Fit for Purpose: Groundwork Trusts and Sustainable Communities Philip Jeffery University of Liverpool, Dave Shaw University of Liverpool The Role of Urban Planning Processes in Creating the Gated Residential Developments: The Periphery of Istanbul Ozgul Acar Middle East Technical University Ankara In quest of the good urban life: Socio-spatial dynamics and building stock transformation in Zurich Frank Ritterhoff TU Berlin, Martina Koll-Schretzenmayr ETH Zurich Securing key worker housing through the planning system: a case study of Cambridge Nicky Morrison University of Cambridge 8.6 Tools and case studies Chair BERNARD BIZET Room 7 Making Land Available — Large Areas for Temporarily Emergency-Retention Thomas Hartmann University of Dortmund Risk Generating Urban Development of Istanbul and Its Legal Background Fatma Unsai Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University “Transfer of Building Ratio” in Greece: Legal adventures of a much promising planning tool Konstantinos Lalenis University of Thessaly, Dimitrios Melissas Pantion University Decentring the planner. The institutional basis of planning success (and failures) in Hong Kong and the Netherlands Bart Wissink Utrecht University | 86 —_ — Schedule and Day-by-day Program oma | | 9.2 National and local identities Chair TANER OC Room 2 Urban Design and the English Urban Renaissance John Punter Cardiff University Post-seismic reconstruction and the method PlaceMaker: mapping the urban identity Marichela Sepe CNR-University of Napoli “Federico II” Space Bound Identity for Metropole Regions: the case of Braunschweig- Géttingen-Hannover, Germany Renate Bornberg, Leibniz Universitat Hannover A Hint of Character Thomas Jefferies Manchester School of Architecture The European Square Ideals in Contemporary Urban Design — In search of true public places Tigran Haas KTH and MIT 12.2 Policy of valorization Chair KLAUS KUNZMANN Room 1 Heritage and Self-Sufficiency in Slow Cities Paul Knox Virginia Tech, Heike Mayer Virginia Tech The interplay between tendencies in political decision-making and goal displacements in planning projects: an alternative view of power and planning, illustrated by a diachronic analysis of Belgian/Flemish spatial planning 1962- 1985 Pieter Saey Ghent University World Heritage Sites: effective tool for conservation or a sophisticated marketing tool? The case of tall building proposals Michael Short University of the West of England Quality Certification in Urban Renewal Valentina Pavan University of Cagliari, Alessia Figus University of Cagliari Adaptive reuse of cultural heritage. Regenerating Nicosia’s historic core Andreas L. Savvides University of Cyprus Schedule and Day-by-day Program —e 14.6 Institutional rensponsibilities Chair MAROS FINKA Room 10 Institutional Framework for Environmental Sergio Planning on the U.S.-Mexico Border Pena The University of Texas at El Paso The environmental impact of institutional change: watershed authorities in Israel Nehemia Shahaf Nahal Shiqma Bsor Watershed Authority, Yulia Alexandrov Ben- Gurion University of the Negev Unsustainable coastal planning and management and its consequences: the case of Costa da Caparica at Lisbon Metropolitan Area Elisabete Freire Technical University of Lisbon Water, river and human systems: integrated strategies towards resilience and quality Angela Colucci Polytechnic of Milano The future of integrated Planning: the development territorial System of Vallo di Diano Vincenzo Russo Campania Region, Michele Rienzo Mountain Community of Vallo di Diano, Tiziana Medici Mountain Community of Vallo di Diano aturday 14 July 2007, 9.00-10.45 1.7 Risk as concept shift: implications on theory and practice Chair GABRIELE PASQUI Room 9 Planning in the face of risk Nurit Alfasi Ben Gurion University of the Negev informality and Information and Communication Technology (ICT): spaces for new networks? Nancy Odendaa! University of KwaZulu-Natal Deconstructing Risk: Towards a Radical Planning Agenda Nabil Kamel Arizona State University, Kathleen Lee Arizona State University The assumed motives of opponents to infrastructure facilities | 88 — | —— Schedule and Day-by-day Program —— | | Maarten Wolsink University of Amsterdam, Jeroen Devilee Social and Cultural Planning Agency, The Hague Strategic planning thought, risk and uncertainty. Lesson from elsewhere Harry Dimitriou Omega Centre, UCL 2.5 Territorial cohesion and spatial policy Chair DOMINIC STEAD Room 4 ‘Territorial cohesion’ as a category of agency: the missing dimension of EU spatial policy debate Enrico Gualini Technical University of Berlin Territorial Cohesion in Germany from a French Perspective Patricia Hammer University of Dortmund, Exploring the “territorial cohesion / economic growth” multi-dimensional field. Evidences from Poland Giancarlo Cotella Polytechnic of Torino Territorial cohesion and urban policy in Europe. Strategies and processes within European Spatial Planning Loris Servillo Polytechnic of Torino Urban Sprawl! in Europe —- New Challenges for Cohesion Policy David Ludlow UWE Bristol 6.7 Researching new paths of governance Chair THOMAS MATTA Room 3 A Struggle towards an Alternative Governance to an Executive-led Government: a case study of harbour-front planning in Hong Kong Mee Kam NG Centre of Uroa n Planning and Environmental Management Linking information to strategic spatial planning processes: From accidental to deliberate policy windows Thomas Straatemeier Universiteit van Amsterdam, Marco te Broémmeistroet Universiteit van Amsterdam, Perry Hoetjes Universiteit van Amsterdam Dreaming for Innovation in Contexts of Power: Democratic Planning practices in Sao Paulo Nilton Torres University of Sao Paulo Schedule and Day-by-day Program — | | Against the creative city. Considerations on different rationalities which “make city” Anna Uttaro University Roma “La Sapienza” Tests of urban government. The occasion of the strategic territorial plan of Campobasso Stefano Consiglio University of Napoli “Federico Il”, Naria Vitellio University of Napoli “Federico II” 7.7 Housing requirements Chair NIKOS KARADIMITRIOU Room 5 Housing typology in a social and economic segregated society: the controversial success of the Brazilian apartment building Tanja Thung University of Stuttgart The recent spatial planning in Flanders in relation to the idea of lifestyles Ann Pisman Economic migration, social cohesion and regional economic development in the UK: the case of the Housing Market Renewal (HMR) Pathfinder Simon Pemberton University of Liverpool, Claire Stevens University of Liverpool Contribution of minimum standards of accessibility to guarantee equality in social life Alexander Neumann University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences Vienna, Wiebke Unbehaun University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences Vienna Cry of the Islands: Conflicts, Social Vulnerability, and Participation in Recovery Planning of Post-Tsunami Thailand Hutanuwatr Khanin Arizona State University 9.3 Problem solving and urban design Chair JOHN PUNTER Room 2 Exploring controversies regarding planning and spatial development in practice Evelien van Rij TU Delft, OTB Preventing planning disasters. The work of the Bos & Lommer Commission Hugo Priemus Defit University of Technology Suburbia and Climate Change: How will the sprawling suburb respond to the effects of global warming? Rafael Pizarro University of Sydney | 90 —_ — Schedule and Day-by-day Program =— Urban design in Germany: Recycling the town and the region Christa Reicher University of Dortmund Policies for the replanning of urban coastal areas. The case of Athens. Comparisons with Hamburg Evangelos Asprogerakas NTU Athens, Konstantinos Serraos NTU Athens, Dimitrios Sofianopoulos NTU Athens 10.5 Land use / transport integration — emerging planning approaches * Chair SHIN LEE Room 12 Four dynamics and one question about mobility in Lisbon metropolitan area Paulo Silva University of Aveiro Road pricing as creative financing for City Regions? An exploratory case study of the Cardiff City Region Shin Lee Cardiff University, Francesca S. Sartorio Cardiff University Urban transformations and mobility infrastructures toward a new planning Carmela Gargiulo University of Napoli “Federico II’, Fiorella de Ciutiis University of Napoli “Federico II” Airport Region of Munich — show-case for lack of territorial governance Michael Dross Technical University of Munchen, Alain Thierstein Transport of hazardous materials by rail: a real risk? Vincent van der Vlies, Radbourn University Nijmegen 12.3 Interpreting historical centres Chair PANTALEON SKAYANNIS Room 1 Understanding city centres through a concept of paradigm shifts Debabardhan Upadhyaya Independent Researcher Ideological Principles Governing the Special Place of Industry in Europe and American Cities: A Cross Atlantic Interpretation John Mullin University of Massachusetts Paris Seen through the Cinematic Movement of the ‘Nouvelle Vague’ Marcella Anthrakopoulou University of Thessaly, Katerina Kaberi University of Thessaly Third Places as the contemporary socialization spaces: a critical overview into eating, living and to coexisting at urban spaces |— . 91 —| Schedule and Day-by-day Program — | | Marcelo Traldi Fonseca Centro Universitario SENAC, Monica Bueno Leme Centro Universitario SENAC, Julio Cesar Butuhy Centro Universitario SENAC Urban Implications of Cultural Policy networks in the US. The case of the Mount Vernon Cultural District in Baltimore Davide Ponzini Polytechnic of Milano 13.1 Planning the rural/periurban space Chair TERRY MARSDEN Room 8 Growth regulation and peri-urban land management: a comparative understanding on regulatory processes within rural commuter belts of major cities Nathalie Bertrand Cemagref, Volker Kreibich University of Dortmund A more strategic zoning plan for rural areas under urban pressure Hans Leinfelder Ghent University From rurban to remote rural development: Contribution of the capability approach Jean-Christophe Dissart Cemagref, Benoit Lallau 1.S.A. Lille Planning in “Rurbania” Kjell Harvoid NIBR, Berit Nordahl NiIBR Promoting rural-urban integration through town planning. The case of Caia, Mozambique Corrado Diamantini University of Trento, Davide Geneletti University of Trento, Francesco Torresani Consorzio Associazioni per il Mozambico, Trento Saturday 14 July 2007, 11.15-13,00 1.8 Planning technologies to face natural risks Chair TORE SAGER Room9 Planning for floods Nico Pieterse Netherlands Institute for Spatial Research, Joost Tennekes Netherlands Institute for Spatial Research Seismic Risks and Urban Mitigation Planning | | | 92 —_ | | | na Schedule and Day-by-day Program amma | | Murat Balamir Middle East Tech. Un. Public Health Risk Planning in Hong Kong: A Post-SARS Perspective Dennis L. H. Hui Centre of Urban Planning and Environmental Management, Mee Kam Ng Centre of Urban Planning and Environmental Management Carrying capacity and development legitimacy Ivan Stanic Urban planning institute of the Republic of Slovenia Metropoli Vesuvio Maria Chiara Pastore, Maria Chiara Piccinelii, Giovanna Maria Silva 2.6 Spatial visions and concepts Chair GABRIELE TATZBERGER Room 4 Positioning in Europe: From Spatial Visions to International Cooperation Wil Zonneveld Delft Univeristy of Technology, Bas Waterhout Delft Univeristy of Technology Polycentric vision in Regional Territorial Planning in Italy Anna Mesolella University of Napoli “Federico II” The polish metropolitan area of Gdansk (Tri-city) between competition and cohesion: practices of European polycentric development Romina Peritore University of RomaTre The corridor concept in transnational spatial planning: a sound basis for cooperation? Stefanie Duhr 6.8 New profiles of local actors Chair BENJAMIN DAVY Room3 City marketing from a perspective of local citizens. A collaborative approach to urban planning using quantitative method Krister Olsson KTH (Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm), Elin Berglund KTH (Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm) Smail country, big plans, colossal participatory challenges Deborah Peel University of Liverpool, Greg Lloyd, University of Liverpool New places and new agents — opening up the planning arena Tamy Stav Radboud university Nijmegen Dealing with Fragmented Interfaces: Institutional Challenges for Planning Peripreee Areas within Metropolitan Regions of South-East Asia | | | Schedule and Day-by-day Program = Delik Hudalah University of Groningen The Relationship in Urban Regeneration Partnership - Case studies in Taipei, Taiwan Hsiang-Leng Chen University of Sheffield, UK 9.4 Rebuilding the fragmented city Chair MARICHELA SEPE Room 2 The potential of the unoccupied space in the future formation of metropolitan Lisbon Sofia Morgado Technical University of Lisbon Exploring the fragments of a discontinuous city: Post-regeneration Manchester Eamonn Canniffe Manchester School of Architecture Designing urban discontinuities Paulo Silva University of Aveiro Belgrade Urban Space Patchwork - Tools for Solving Conflicts Between Physical Environment and Users Needs Aleksandra Djukic University of Belgrade, Milena Vukmirovie University of Belgrade Manchester, mixed messages in new urban topography Michael Hebbert University of Manchester UK 10.6 Land use/transport integration — new planning tools Chair CAREY CURTIS Room12 Multiple accessibility: developing a tool for. evaluating land use-transport integration Jan Scheurer Murdoch University, Western Australia, Carey Curtis Curtin University of Technology, Western Australia Planning for accessibility: Helping policymakers to develop integrated regional land-use and transport strategies in the Netherlands Thomas Straatemeier, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Luca Bertolini Universiteit van Amsterdam Micro scale spatial relationships in urban studies Akkelies van Nes Deift Technical University Barrier-free accessability model Marek Mihola VSB-TU Ostrava, Ostrava | | 94 —_ | | — Schedule and Day-by-day Program a 12.4 The aim of sustainability Chair ALEX DEFFNER Room 1 Sustainable communities as post-modernist grand narrative Judith Allen University of Westminster Sustainable waterfront communities Giovanna Codato Associazione di Gestione Centro Citta, Elena Franco Associazione di Gestione Centro Citta, Zenia Kotval Michigan State University From Junk to Funk : The Use of Off Cultural Spaces in Urban Regeneration Elsa Vivant IFU- Paris 8 Unplanned heritage dilemmas Violeta Puscasu University Dunarea de Jos Galati Conservation problematic of the cultural heritage of the small traditional settlements: Karabaglar, Mugla Feray Koca Middle East Technical University The walled city of Gazimagusa/Famagusta: the loss of the architectural heritage due to ongoing conflict Hacer Basarir, University of Manchester 13.2 Landscapes at risk Chair DOMENICO PATASSINI Room 8 Scale dependent synergy between risk management and open space preservation Terry van Dijk Wageningen University Toward a lesser landscape Antonio di Campli University of Pescara A Genealogy of Spatial Concepts of the Dutch National Landscape Het Groene Woud Janneke Hagens Wageningen University “New Wilderness”: risk or chance for the contemporary cities? Mariavaleria Mininni Polythecnic of Bari, Anna Migliaccio University of Napoli “Federico II" Planning change: lessons from a Dutch rurban region Hetty van der Stoep Wageningen University NL Adri van den Brink 95 —_ Schedule and Day-by-day Program ste 14.7 Challenges from climate changes Chair FILIPPO SCHILLECI Room 10 Climate Change: How planners can contribute in cutting green-house gas emissions; A case study on the city of Vienna Karin Hiltgartner Vienna University of Technology, Richard Kaller Vienna University of Technology, Dietmar KohibGck Vienna University of Technology, Nina Svanda Vienna University of Technology Adapting planning for climate change adaptation: Policy development and implications for the planning system in Finland Lasse Peltonen Helsinki University of Technology Planning for Climate Change: The Role of Planners Jim London Clemson University The evaluation of inert material needs with regard to the province of Cagliari Ginevra Balletto University of Cagliari, Alessandra Milesi University of Cagliari, Noemi Meloni University of Cagliari, Giovanni Mei University of Cagliari, Donatella Moi University of Cagliari, Riccardo Sanna University of Cagliari, Nevio Usai University of Cagliari Agricoltural planning and biomass energy. A GIS approach Silvia Dalla Costa IUAV Venezia, Silvia Castelli IUAV Venezia, Matelda Reho IUAV Venezia aturday 14 July 2007, 14.30-16.15 1.9 Risk mitigation policy and planning practices Chair LAURA LIETO Room 9 Territorial Cohesion and Marine Spatial Planning: A New Arena for Balancing Wealth and Risk Sue Kidd University of Liverpool Department of Civic Design Planning risk by urban planning Daniela Mello Urban Department (Naples Municipality) Do not worry, be happy: it’s only a matter of risk. Regasification and ecology of fear in Taranto, Italy Valeria Monno Polytechnic of Bari | | | | || Schedule and Day-by-day Program — | Which problem forces us to be more resilient ? Immediate deterioration or cumulative crises? Clovis Ultramari Catholic University of Parana, Curitiba, Denis A. Rezende Catholic University of Parana, Curitiba Personal, Residential and Public Space - a Modal Perspective Kimmo Lapintie Helsinki University of Technology China’s pro-growth urban planning in rapid urbanization Jieming Zhu National University of Singapore 2.7 EU policies and programmes Chair UMBERTO JANIN RIVOLIN Room 4 EU regional policy and spatial planning in the Apulia region, Which break with the past? Carla Tedesco Polytechnic of Bari EU-funding of urban regeneration - risk of losing regionay ; implementation of high standards? Julia Meyer dentity or A general methodology for the implementation of urban a polycentric system with the ESDP and ESPON framework Gianfranco Macchi University of Udine, Sandro Fabbro University of Udine nd regional EU programs as part of national urban policies Paulo Silva University of Aveiro Learning from the Green Paper on EU Maritime Policy: Policy Integration to Achieve Balanced European Territorial Development Nicole Schaefer Federal Office for Building and Regional Planning (BBR) 4.7 Developing local resources Chair ANDREAS VOIGT Room 6 The planning role in the processes of construction of the loca} development Emanuela Coppola University of Napoli “Federico II” Factors in the university - city interaction: The case of Gree, Regional Universities Yiota C. Theodora University of Thessaly Schedule and Day-by-day Program sommes The increasing importance of cities in technological innovations Jung Won Sonn Cardiff University Formal and Informal Institutions Role in Local Tourism Development Process Nikolaos Triantafytlopoulos University of Thessaly as Social impact assessment in regional land-use planning Timo Heikkinen Helsinki University of Technology 6.9 Integrating stakeholders and planning tools Chair ELENA DIMITROVA Room 3 Tools for conviviality in planning practices Laura Basco University of Napoli “Federico II” Integrating Public Policy Through A Spatial Perspective: The role of the Regional Spatial Strategy Andrew Moore University of Liverpool Overcoming the Legacies of the Automobile City - Citizen Advocacy For and Against Light Rail Transit on Los Angeles’ West Side Peters Deike TU Berlin Planning and implementation - from distinction to concurrent processes Erja Vayrynen Helsinki University of Technology Conceptualising Local Strategic Partnerships in the UK- A New Framework for Local Governance Glory Edozien University of Reading 9.5 Meaning and value of urban spaces Chair PAULO SILVA Room 2 Obesogenic urban form: exploring influences on the behaviour of young adults Tim Townshend Newcastle University, Amelia Lake Newcastle University Calibrating Urbanity: the Logic of Interfaces Jan Schreurs K.U.Leuven Dubai’s Waterfront Cartography: Urban Design as a 2-Dimensional Artwork Amer Moustafa American University of Sharjah Trends and spacialities Marcelo Traldi Fonseca Centro Universitario SENAC, Monica Bueno Leme Centro Universitario SENAC, Julio Cesar Butuhy Centro Universitario SENAC | 98 — — Schedule and Day-by-day Program —— | Lefebvre Applied: Premissing Place-Marketing Plans on Lefebvre’s Spatial Categories Alex Deffner University of Thessaly, Nick Bogiazides, University of Thessaly, Theodore Metaxas University of Thessaly 10.7 Sustainable transport modes - institutional issues and policy transfer Chair KATHRINE STROMMEN Room 12 The risks involved in changing the way we do things: working with partners to improve bus services in the UK Angela Hull University of the West of England The ‘California effect’ in sustainable transport policy: its desirability and problems Shin Lee Cardiff University Sustainable urban transport policy transfer in Central and Eastern Europe Dominic Stead TUDelft, Martin de Jong TUDelft Transit Oriented Development in Campania: towards a more sustainable city region? Enrica Papa University of Napoli “Federico II” How vulnerable and resilient are cities in case of a sudden oil crisis? Anders Langeland University of Stavanger 12.5 Conflicting preservations Chair TEJO SPIT Room 1 ' The evaluation of territorial attractiveness by cultural facilities: a case of contemporary art museum in Vitry-sur-Seine (France) Jung Yoon Park Labo.CRETEIL, IUP, University of Paris XII Cultural heritage sites and the challenges of urban development; Azza Sirry Housing and Building Research Center Cairo The Francigena Itinerary in Piacenza Monica Bolledi Polytechnic of Milano Urbanism : uncertain object? A focus on the American debate Lucio Giecillo Universita RomaTre The new law 3028/2002 for the protection of the antiquities and the cultural heritage in Greece Fotini Zigouri University of Thessaly Z . _ Schedule and Day-by-day Program _ 13.3 Rural/urban changing relationships Chair CORRADO DIAMANTINI Room 8 Rurbanism and Environmental Disasters Hassan Afrakhteh Tehran TMU University Entwined aspirations in the urban-rural fringe: the emergence and influence of new coalitions of green infrastructure champions on the UK city-region agenda Steve Littlewood Leeds Met University Riga City Hinterland Planning in the Context of Post-Soviet Transformations: Growth versus Conservation Laila Kule University of Latvia Rural-urban relationships - the search for the evidence base Andreas Schulze Baing University of Liverpool Planning the rural spaces in the Neapolitan metropolitan area: an impossible challenge? Biagio Cillo 2nd University of Napoli 14.8 Land, landscape and energy Chair PETER DRIESSEN Room 10 Planning at the Margins: the Development of Offshore Wind Farms Stephen Jay Sheffield Hallam University, UK Land suitability and land use change evaluation in new forms of planning Alessia Figus University of Cagliari, Chiara Garau University of Cagliari Can Regional Planning foster Sustainable Development? The Swedish governmental discourse on sustainable regional development versus regional planning practice Maria Hakansson Urban and Regional Studies, KTH, Stockholm Towards a future energy system related to regional planning Nanka Karstkarel University of Groningen, Gert de Roo University of Groningen Low-carbon restructuring and the politics of urban and regional development Aidan While University of Sheffield | 100 — | | | al Schedule and Day-by-day Program — Saturday 14 July 2007 Closing session Venue: Auditorium Royal Continental Hotel Time: 16.30-18.30 Keynote lectures Kenneth Reardon, University of Cornell Ithaca USA Pursuing Equity Planning in Post-Katrina New Orleans: Lessons from the 9° Ward Recovery Planning Process Paolo Gasparini, Director of National Institute of Geophisyc and Vulcanology, Italy Risk Vesuvius Francesco D. Moccia, Province of Napoli Risk prevention and mitigation plan for Vesuvius area AESOP Flag Ceremony 101 —_ Ses BEE ee a pee Mobile Workshops — Mobile Workshops — General Information Date: Friday, 13.07.07 Organisation: Emanuela Coppola, Federico II University Email: emanuela.coppola @ fastwebnet. it Nine mobile workshops have been selected for those interested in discovering Napoli. Advance registration was necessary for participation in the Mobile Workshops. All workshops will be held on Friday afternoon. They will be led by qualified English-speaking guides. The mobile workshops will leave from a pre-determined departure point to which participants will have to make their own way. Please check at the registration Desk where your meeting point is located and please make sure you are there in good time. Mobile Workshop_1 EU Urban Program in 2 historical neighborhoods Organisation Gaetano Mollura, Napoli Municipality Email urban @comune.napoili.it EU Urban Program is an integrated program of urban regeneration, social inclusion and economic development. This mobile workshop takes visitors to 2 historical neighborhoods, the “Quartieri Spagnoli” and “Sanita” . “Quartieri Spagnoli” is the historical name of this neighborhood, built in the XVI century on the trace of the Spanish military camps garrisons and along the main street “Toledo”, from the name of the Spanish viceroy that built it. From a urban planning point of view, this neighborhood represents the core of the modern Napoli city. The Sanita neighborhood, originally a suburb separated from the central city, was then included in the urban structure starting from XVI century . The mobile workshop will conclude with the visit to the theatre laboratories sponsored by the Urban Project, as well as the new social center, the “Spagnuolo” Building, the Toto Museum, the “guarrattelle” museum and S. Gennaro gardens in piazza San Vincenzo. Point and time of departure Where: Central Cableway Station, via Toledo When: 16:45 | 7 104 a |—" Mobile Workshops — | Mobile Workshop_2 The underground city Organisation: Daniela Gianpaola, Archeolocical Superintendent of Napoli and Caserta Organisation: Giancarlo Ferulano, Napoli Municipality A visit to the ruins of the Greek and Roman landmarks in the underground core of the city. The Greek ruins discovered in the subway construction site in Plebiscito Square, the archaeological area of S. Lorenzo Church and the Roman Theater. This tour starts from the Roman Theater where — between legend and history — they say that emperor Nerone made an exhibition. Actually, it is only a portion of the ancient theater that contained up to 7000people. The rest is under the buildings and the streets of the historical center, via San Paolo, via Anticaglia, vico Cinquesaniti. Point and time of departure Where: University Congress Center, via Partenope When: 16:30 Mobile Workshop_3 The subway stations of arts Organisation: Elena Camerlingo, Napoli Municipality Further information: http://www.metro.na.it A trip through the new metro stations/open museums of contemporary arts. The works of art in the stations of the subway (cloths, sculptures and photos) constitute a formidable mean for the traveller, distracted and hasty for definition, to approach contemporary art. A cultural operation to eliminate the psychological barrier that can be represented by a museum. But also an investment on contemporary architecture, as the choice to submit to different architects (Alessandro Mendini for Salvator Rosa and Materdei stastions, Domenico Orlacchio for Quattro Giornate station, and Gae Aulenti for Museo e Dante stations) the design of some stations clearly shows, in the perspective that each architect could express an autonomous identity inside the city. Point and time of departure Where: University Congress Center, via Partenope When: 16:30 | i 105 _ Mobile Workshops —_— Mobile Workshop_4 Western area’s vacant industrial site Organisation: Giovanni Capasso, Bagnoli Futura SpA Further information: http://www. bagnolifutura. it A visit to the Bagnoli area, previous steel plant site and future urban park. Bagnolifutura SpA is a urban transformation society that has been constituted in 2002. The mission of Bagnolifutura is the planning and the realization of interventions of urban transformation in the Bagnoli industrial site in the western area in Naples. The latest projec of the sosciety is the Sports Park on a surface of around 42 hectares. Point and time of departure Where: University Congress Center, via Partenope When: departure of bus 16:30 Mobile Workshop_5 The Harbour and the historical waterfront requalification project Organisation: Pietro Capogreco, Napoli Port Authority Further information: hittp:/www.porto.napoil.it The foundation of Naples and its port unquestionably dates back to the period of Greek colonisation; in the ninth century B.C. a group of sailors from Rhodes reached this part of the coast and, between the seventh and sixth centuries B.C., the Greek colony was founded on the Acropolis of Pizzofalcone. Actually, Naples Port Authority is the governing organisation of the port area. This area stretches for about 20 kms along the coastline from La Pietra (Pozzuoli) to Pietrarsa (Portici). The area exclusively connected to port functions is about 4 kms and stretches from Vigliena to Molosiglio, including the port of Sannazzaro, known as the port of Mergellina, a subsidiary port of the port of Naples. Recently the Port of Naples has recovered a dialogue with the city through the elimination of the walls once separating it from the rest of the city. The plans of rationalization and specialization of the areas make the port an economic entity in a harmonic context between the city and the sea. Point and time of departure Where: Mercadante Theater, piazza Municipio When: 16:45 106 —_ |me | Mobile Workshops Mobile Workshop_7 Public Housing in the suburbs Organisation: Costanzo loni, Napoli Municipality Email: casacitta@comune.napoli.it Further information: www.comune. napoli. it/urbana The Department of Urban planning of the Municipality of Napoli has organised a visit to the residential neighborhoods realized within the extraordinary Housing Program (PSERN) after the 1980 earthquake. The visit, by bus, starts from via Partenope to reach the Eastern Area of Naples. It will be possible to visit two important parts of the program: the first one concerns the projects realized in the historical centre of Ponticelli, in particular the recovery interventions of court buildings; the second one regards the area of Villa in the quarter of S. Giovanni a Teduccio. The visit will finish with a promenade on the beach of S. Giovanni a Teduccio, where the new urban projects for the coast of the quarter will be illustrated. Point and time of departure Where: University Center Congress, via Partenope When: departure of bus 16:30 Mobile Workshop_8 The UNESCO World Heritage sites in the historical center Organisation: Ugo Carughi, Superintendent of National Monuments Further information: http:// www.sitiunesco. it Napoii is one of the most ancient cities in Europe. The historical center preserve today the elements of its urban history from the road system to the historical buildings. It is testimony of a remarkable exchange of knowledges during a determined period, or in one determined cultural area, on the development of the architecture or the technology, of the monumental arts, of the planning of the city, or of the creation of landscapes. The visit to an urban UNESCO’s World Heritage site is organized and conducted from the Superintendent of National Monuments Point and time of departure Where: University Congress Center, via Partenope When: 16:30 —_ 107 —_ | | — Mobile Workshops — | | Mobile Workshop_9 Integrated Territorial Project City of Napoli Organisation: Francesca lacono, Napoli Municipality Further information: hittp://www.regione.campania.it The Integrated Project aims atstrengthening the image of Napoli as international, Mediterranean and European city through the recapture and recovery of the city/sea and center/suburbs relationships. The workshop offers a visit to some infrastructural projects financed by the EU development program, as well as a walk from the Municipio Square to the Goldsmiths Area and the Marinella Park. Point and time of departure Where: University Congress Center, via Partenope When: departure of bus 16:30 Mobile Workshop_10 St. Martino Vineyard Organisation: Francesco Coppola, Federico II University Originally a property of the monks of the San Martino’s Chartreuse, on top of the Vomero hill, the vineyard stands as one of the most important landmarks in the — urban landscape, visible from almost any spot of the lower city, right down and around the S. Elmo Fortress. This piece of landscape’s main feature is the presence of historical agricultural terraces, cultivated still today. In the Napoli’s new master plan, the area is sorted as historical agricultural zone and it’s part of the Hills Metropolitan Park, a wide open space system surrounding the inner city along the hills line. In the same plan, a special focus on the hydro-geological and landslide risk concerning the area addresses interventions of environmental renewal and maintenance. In the last few years, the vineyard has been in the middle of an interesting experience of local development. focusing on the issue of multi-functional urban agriculture: a civic association, made of landowners, residents, practitioners and citizens, has been promoting this issue in the last decade to improve and practice landscape safeguard, environment protection, land maintenance and consumers defence. Point and time of departure Where: Central Cableway Station, via Toledo When: 16:50 | 7 108 “a Se | Study Tours — | | | Study tours_ General Information Date: Sunday, 15.07.07 Organisation: Emanuela Coppola, Federico II University Email: emanuela.coppola @ fastwebnet. it Practical Notes . Advance registration was necessary for participation in the Study tours. All tours will be held on Sunday, July 15, and start in front of the Continental Hotel — close to the University Congress Center — except Study tour 1, which will move - from the Mergellina Hydroplanes Port. Tours start at different times. Please check at the registration Desk and the be at- meeting point in good time (15 minutes before the scheduled departure time). All tours will be led by qualified English-speaking guides. Study tour_4 The Integrated Territorial Project “Tourist ports and marinas” (A boat tour in the Napoli Gulf) Organisation: Brunella Rallo, Campania Region Email: b.rallo@ regione.campania.it Primary objective of the Integrated Territorial Project is the requalification of the tourist ports and marinas system with improvement interventions, structures and port services adjustment aiming at the expansion and the efficiency growth of the coastal economic system and to the creation of new boat seats for the nautical tourism in a complete rationalization of the moorings system. The boat tour in the Gulf of Napoli has many stops in some of the new ports and marinas financed by EU and Campania Region: Monte di Procida (Acquamorta Touristic Port), Procida Island (Sancio Cattolico Marina), the tourist ports in Sorrento peninsula, the Fuksas project for Castellammare nautical pole, the requalification of Bourbons landing-stage in Ercolano. The visit is organized and conducted from the regional responsible the of the Integrated Territorial Project “Tourist ports and marinas, Brunella Rallo. Further information: http://www.regione.campania.it Point and time of departure Where: Mergellina Hydroplanes Port — via Caracciolo When: departure at 08:30 110 — |= Study Tours | | | Study tour_5 Integrated Territorial Project Chartreuse of Padula and Vallo di Diano (Vallo di Diano Area in Salerno Country) Organization: Vincenzo Russo, Campania Region Email: v.russo@regione.campania.it The tour consists of a visit to the Vallo di Diano Area, a striking landscape to see from the peak of the Mount Cervati, the highest mountain of the area, @ valley born out of a pleistocenic lake of high natural and geological value. The Integrated Territorial Project Chartreuse of Padula and Vallo di Diano aims at integrating exploitation, promotion and innovative land use of the Chartreuse of Padula, in a trial that transforms the Vallo di Diano Area in a tourist cultural system. The proposed interventions go from the requalification of this great Cultural heritage to the endowment of infrastructures and services, the training of human resources to the expansion of the reception system. In the morning, the plan is to visit Padula and the S. Lorenzo Chartreuse (the greatest one of Southern Italy), and the PIT area (Integrated Territorial Project) with illustration of the development project from the PIT coordinator, Vincenzo Russo. Lunch will be in an farm resort-resturant with typical products of the Mediterranean kitchen. In the afternoon, there will be a visit to Teggiano, San Giovanni in Fonte and Sansa, three historic centres that maintain an almost intact urban form. Afterwards, the visit will continue to the Door of the National Park, known as “Orchids Valley” ( a striking landscape of high visual quality), the Bussento River and the famous and extraordinary Pertosa Caves. The visit is organized and conducted from the regional responsible of PIT Chartreuse of Padula and Vallo di Diano, arch. Vincenzo Russo. Further information: http:/Avww. comune.padula.sa.it Point and time of departure Where: Continental Hotel, via Partenope When: departure at 08:00 || | Study Tours | | Study tour_6 Engineering solutions versus risk prevention land use planning (Scafati- Poggiomarino-Sarno-Episcopio) Organization: Giuliano Cannata, Sarno River Auhtority Email: giulianocannata @ fastwebnet. it A trip to the highest-hydrogeological risk rural areas, where policies of risk prevention and mitigation are now under experimentation. The Sarno area was damaged in 1998 by a big, distructive flood due to bad weather conditions and high hydrogeological risk. The territory under competence of the authority of the Sarno Basin occupies a surface of 715,42 kmqs, corresponding to the 5,23% of the whole surfaceof the Campania Region. It is characterized by complex problems that compromise the existing resources and their rational development in terms of valorisation and management. Particularly, the area is under critical conditions for hydrogeological risk, water and atmospheric pollution, coastal erosion, environmental degradation and high demographic pressure. In the morning, the tour takes visitors to the Sarno River Authority (piazzetta G. Fortunato in Napoli city) where Giuliano Cannata will give a presentation of the studies and projects in progress. Then the visit will continue to the River Park in Scafati, to see the outfall of the Sarno River with its great hydraulic works. The lunch will be in an farm resort-resturant with typical products of the Mediterranean kitchen. In the afternoon, the tour will move to the paleolithic village of Longola, an extraordinarily intact prehistoric village of piles. The tour will conclude with the historic centres of Sarno and Episcopio, partially destroyed by the earthquake. The visit is organized and conducted from the responsible of the Sarno River Authority, ing. Giuliano Cannata. Further information: http://www.autoritabacinosarno. it Point and time of departure Where: Continental Hotel, via Partenope When: departure of bus at 09:00 112 —_ | | —_ Study Tours o— Study tour_9 The vesuvians: people that challenge the risk (Ercolano- Vesuvius coastal area) Organisation: Emma Buondonno, Ercolano Municipality Email: emmbuond @unina. it; Organisation: Leopoldo Spedaliere, Development Agency Costa del Vesuvio . Email: segreteria @ tesscampania. it In the morning visitors will go to the archaeological site of Ercolano, a medium size city under the Vesuvius, the world’s most famous active volcano, which destroyed it together with Pompei with the eruption in 79 AD . The visit will continue among history, nature, art and architecture with a ride on the “Miglio d’Oro” (the Golden Mile), the historic avenue from Ercolano to Torre del Greco with a big concentration of Vesuvian Villas, sumptuous buildings with gardens degrading toward the sea. The tour stops in some of the most suggestive places of the Vesuvius Area: the historical Palace in Portici — the royal summer residence of the Bourbons -, the “Granatello” historical port, the extraordinary Park of Villa Favorita , the project site of the 1% ecological corridor and the Integrated Territorial Project “Ercolano-Pompei’, and Villa Ruggiero — headquarter of the Development Agency Costa del Vesuvio where an illustration of the agency main projects will take place. Lunch will be at the Crowne Plaza Hotel, a luxury resort which is the core of a requalification project of an archeological industrial site— originally a steelworks —, with typical products of the Mediterranean kitchen. In the afternoon the tour will continue at the Castellammare nautical pole. Further information: http://www. villevesuviane.net; http:// www.tesscostadelvesuvio.it Point and time of departure Where: Continental Hotel, via Partenope When: departure of bus at 08:30 | 113 —_ Committee and Board Meetings nt Committees and Board Meetings uesday, July 10 8.00-12.30 13.00-17.00 GPEAN Steering Committee venue: Dept. Urban Design and Planning, Meeting Hall via Forno Vecchio 36 - 5th floor stair E GPEAN Coordinating Committee venue: Dept. Urban Design and Planning, Meeting: Hall via Forno Vecchio 36 - 5th floor stair E ednesday, July 11 9.00-12.00 14.00-16.00 16.00-17.00 17.00-19.00 16.00-18.00 AESOP EX-CO venue: Congress venue, Room 3 AESOP CO-REP venue: Congress venue, Room 3 AESOP STACO venue: Congress venue, Room 11 GPEAN Presidents meeting venue: Congress venue, Room 3 AESOP Communication Team venue: Congress venue, Room 12 Planning Theory Board Meeting venue: Congress venue, Room 10 Planning Theory and Research Board Meeting venue: Congress venue, Room 8 116 = = Committee and Board Meetings 17.00-19.00 Excellence in Teaching Competition Committee venue: Congress venue, Room 5 Best Congress Paper Competition Committee venue: Congress venue, Room 6 Best Paper Published Competition Committee venue: Congress venue, Room 7 hursday, July 12 19.00-20.30 AESOP General Assembly Venue: Congress venue, Room 9 Friday, July 13 8.00-9.00 AESOP Thematic Groups “Complexity and planning” venue: Congress venue Room 11 » “Energy and spatial planning” venue: Congress venue Room 1 “Planning law and property rights” venue: Congress venue Room 2 Saturday, July 14 8.00-9.00 AESOP Thematic Groups “Transport policy and planning” venue: Congress venue Room 1 “Franco-British planning study group” venue: Congress venue Room 2 aa 117 a | | Conference Guidelines aa | | Venue All meetings will take place at the University “Federico II” Congress Center, via Partenope 36. The Opening session will be held at the Auditorium of the Royal Continental Hotel, right next to the University Congress Center. Registration and information desk will be located in the main hall of the University Congress Center. The welcome reception will be held in the Lobby of the Royal Continental Hotel. Lunches will be served at the restaurant of Royal Continental Hotel. Coffee breaks will be served in the University Congress Center, in the cafeteria at third floor. Language The working language of the Conference is English. | | — Conference Guidelines | | Presenter guidelines Participants are required to give a dynamic and thought-provoking presentation of their work. Given the high number of presentations scheduled for the 2007 Aesop Conference in Napoli, they will have just 15 minutes to present their papers in a formal session. General information Upon arrival at the conference venue, and after picking up their registration materials, presenters are asked to contact the person in charge for audiovisual assistance in session rooms. They can hand over their presentation file, any means they prefer (ppt files, slides, videos, etc..), provided that they’re in one of the following formats: Cd rom, floppy disk or pen-drive. Computers in session rooms will be Windows-based PCs with Microsoft PowerPoint (Office XP) installed. They’ll be connected, in all session rooms, with videoprojectors. We recommend Ppt files, but will accept also Pdf and Html files as well. Presentations created on PC or Mac should work fine, but presenters are required to test their files before the session starts, especially if they have Mac files. Presenters are required to use standard fonts only (Arial, Times New Roman, etc..). They can’t connect their own laptop to the videoprojector in use in the session room where they’re scheduled. They’re asked to arrive to the session room at the latest five minutes before the session starts. Those who are unable to present at the scheduled time must notify the Conference manager and withdraw from the program. Schedules cannot be rearranged. Presentation tips Introduce yourself to the track chairs (if present at the moment) and the session chair. You have 15 minutes to give your presentation. You won't have any extra time: the session chair will time-manage the whole session, leaving a 30-minute time slot for debate after all scheduled presentations. For technical assistance, any room will be staffed by planning students. A general technical manager will coordinate their activity during the sessions. We strongly encourage you to print out your full paper in different copies, so that you can distribute it during the session. —_ 121 | | Conference Guidelines — | | Chair guidelines Please, arrive at the presentation room at the latest five minutes before the session starts and introduce yourself to the presenters. You'll be assisted by a room attendant who’s in charge for audio-visual equipment. Remember all participants the maximum time allowed for their paper presentation (15 minutes) and, during presentations, make sure they respect the right time. Briefly introduce the session. For each paper, introduce author and title. The second part of the session - a 30 minutes time slot - is for questions and debate: you’re in charge for coordination and will ask questioners to identify themselves and keep their interventions as short as possible. Please, ensure that the session finishes on time. Registration and information desk It will be located in the Conference Venue’s main hall. It will be staffed during regular conference hours. Any question about conference’s program, mobile workshops or study tours, the personell will do their best to help. Name badges Participants are kindly requested to wear their name badge at all time during the Conference. Admittance to social events will be granted only to persons wearing a name badge. 122 a Conference Facilities — Registration desk University “Federico II” Congress Center, via Partenope 36, Main Hall. Find your way All conference sessions will take place at the University “Federico Il’ Congress Center. For easy location of sessions, each room will be named with progressive numbers, as shown in the venue maps at the end of this programme book. Assistance will be provided throughout the conference. The staff at the information desk and student helpers will try to help for any problem or request. Internet room Itis located at the ground floor (see map). PC internet connections will be available free of charge to participants. Internet room will be attended by a student helper at all times. 124 =a | aan Organizing Committee =F Local Organizing Committee prof. Francesco Domenico Moccia, chair prof. Laura Lieto, deputy-chair dott. Daniela De Leo dott. Emanuela Coppola dott. Giuseppe Guida Scientific Committee prof. Attilio Belli, University of Napoli “Federico II” prof. Tullio D’Aponte, University of Napoli “Federico II” prof. Paolo Gasparini, University of Napoli “Federico II” prof. Luigi Mazza, Polytechnic of Milano prof. Francesco Domenico Moccia, University of Napoli “Federico II” Conference Organizer GP Pubbliche Relazioni srl via S. Pasquale a Chiaia 55 80121 Napoli, Italy ph +39 081 411450 412835 fax +39 081 404036 www.gpcongress.com Conference Secretariat University of Napoli “Federico II” Faculty of Architecture, Department of Urban Design and Planning via Forno Vecchio 36, 80134 Napoli, Italy ph +39 081 2538608 - 626 fax +39 081 2538601 www.aesop2007napoii.it, www.unina.it es 126 = — Index of Authors — Index of Authors A Abdel Galil Rania 62 Abram Simone 79 Acar Ozgul 86 Ache Peter 59 Adler Sy 69 Afrakhteh Hassan 100 Albrechts Louis 64 Alexandrov Yulia 88 Alfasi Nurit 88 Ali Amal K. 83 Allen Judith 64 95 Alterman Rachelle 65 Amborski David 66 Amdam Jergen 74 Amro Jamal 85 Angelidis Minas 74 Angotti Tom 59 Anthrakopoulou Marcella 91 Apostol Illeana 63 Archibugi Franco 74 Aschemann Ralf 58 Asprogerakas Evangelos 63, 91 Bader Johannes 74 Bailey Nick 71 Balamir Murat 93 Balducci Alessandro 70 Ballari Luisa 77 Balletto Ginevra 80, 96 Ballif Florine 67 Banachowicz Beata 59 Banerjee Tridib 83 Basarir Hacer 95 Basco Laura 98 Bazin Marcel 67 Becker Elke 75 Belcakova Ingrid 58 Berglund Elin 93 Berruti Gilda 80 Bertolini Luca 66, 94 eo 128 4 ae Index of Authors Bertrand Nathalie 92 Besussi Elena 84 Beunen Raoul 63, 73 Bhardwaj Asmita 73 Biesbroek Robbert 84 Bini Giada 71 Bizet Bernard 60 Bogiazides Nick 77, 99 Bolledi Monica 99 Bonafede Giulia 76 Bonifazi Alessandro 83 Bornberg Renate 87 Bornstein David 72 Botero Veronica 78 Breda-Vazquez Isabel 59, 60 Briata Paola 75 Broaddus Andrea 82 Brunetta Grazia 63 Bueno Leme Monica 92, 98 Buitelaar Edwin 77 Butuhy Julio Cesar 92, 98 Cc Caceres Eduardo 60 Calogero Pietro 59, 62 Canniffe Eamonn 94 Card Pauline 76 Cardone Barbara 61 Carmon Dafna 65 Cassani Matilde 85 Castelli Silvia 78, 96 Castro Eduardo 79 Cavola Lucia 65 Ceudech Andrea 66 Chakhar Salem 66 Chang Elizabeth S. 61 Chen Hsiang-Leng 94 Chen Yun 85 Chirita Viorel 67 Ciaffi Daniela 77 Cianflone Tiziana 73 Cillo Biagio 100 Cimmino Pasquale 65 Cividin Alessia 58, 79 Codato Giovanna 95 Colonna Romano Laura 71 — 129 aan Index of Authors Colucci Angela 88 Conceigao Paulo 60 Consiglio Stefano 90 Coppola Emanuela 97 Cotella Giancarlo 89 Coussée Filip 80 Cozzi Silvia 66 Crawford Pat 69 Crespo José 61 Crot Laurence 59 Cruz Solis Heriberto 66 Curtis Carey 94 D Dabovic Tijana 62 Dalla Costa Silvia 72, 96 Dammers Ed 71, 84 Dandekar Hemalata C. 79 Dangschat Jens S. 70 Danielewicz Justyna 59 Davies Tom 76 Davoudl Simin 58, 70 Davy Benjamin 74 de Ciutiis Fiorella 91 de Jong Martin 77, 99 De Leo Daniela 71 de Roo Gert 100 De Rynck Filip 80 de Vries Aldert 84 De Vries Jochem 62 Deffner Alex 99 Demerutis Arenas Juan 72 Deng Xuan 71 Devilee Jeroen 89 di Campli Antonio 95 Di Ciompo Floridea 62 di Martino Ferdinando 61 Di Prinzio Luigi 72, 78 Diamantini Corrado 78, 92 Digrandi Angela 65 Dillinger Thomas 57 Dimitriou Harry 84, 89 Dimitrova Elena 78 Dissart Jean-Christophe 92 Djordjevic Dejan 62 Djukic Aleksandra 94 — 130 . —— Index of Authors Doenitz Ulrich 75 Drake Reitan Meredith 83 Drapela Emil 82 Driessen Peter 73 Dross Michael 91 Duhr Stefanie 93 E Edozien Glory 98 Elisei Pietro 84 Ellis Geraint 75 Epstein David 75 Esteves Carlos 79 Evans Neil 68 Evers David 63, 84 F Fabbro Sandro 62, 97 Fabianski Caroline 77 Faludi Andreas 58 Farthing Stuart 79 Fausto Brito Adriana 66 Fedeli Valeria 76 Feliu Jaume 72 Fenster Tovi 64 Fernandes Miguel 83 Fernandes Ruben 60 Ferretti Alessia 64 Fidelis Teresa 67 Fistola Romano 77 Figus Alessia 87, 100 Fischer Friedhelm 57 Fischer Thomas B 58 Fookes Tom 76 Férster Agnes 59 Franco Elena 95 Frank Andrea 58, 74 Frassoldati Francesca 69 Freire Elisabete 61, 88 iT 131 eet Index of Authors G Gaber John 80 Gaffikin Frank 58 Gagnor Elena 85 Galderisi Adriana 67 Garau Chiara 100 Garb Yaakov 75 Garelli Glenda 70 Gargiulo Carmela 91 Gazzola Paola 58 Geneletti Davide 78, 92 Giampino Annalisa 71 Giecillo Lucio 99 Giordano Michele 61 Giovene di Girasole Eleonora 80 Giulietti Fabrizio 77 Goebel Viktor 59 Goonewardena Kanishka 75 Gospodini Aspa 84 Grabaum Ralf 67 Grassini Laura 69 Graute Ulrich 84 Groetelaers Danielle 60 Grunau Jens-Peter 63 Gualini Enrico 75, 89 Gueci Dario 73 Guida Giuseppe 81 Gunay Zeynep 82 Gunder Michael 73 Gunnarsson Ulrika 83 H Haas Tigran 87 Hachmann Verena 68 Hagens Janneke 63, 95 Hakansson Maria 100 Hambleton Robin 70 Hammer Patricia 89 Hananel Ravit 60 Hansen Carsten Jahn 79 Haran Nadav 59 Harper Tom 62 Harris Neil 68 Hartmann Thomas 86 Harvold Kjell 92 | 132 == Index of Authors Haselsberger Beatrix 62 Haworth Anna 71 Healey Patsy 57, 68 Hebbert Michael 94 Heikkinen Timo 98 Hemberger Christoph 63 Hendrixen Peter 76 Hibbard Michael 78 Higgins Marilyn 74 Hillier Jean 72, 73 Hiltgartner Karin 96 Hirschler Petra 62 Hoetjes Perry 57, 89 Hdjer Mattias 83 Hudalah Delik 94 Hui Dennis L. H. 93 Hull Angela 99 Hutanuwatr Khanin 90 Hutter Gérard 61, 70 Infusino Silvia 84 Innauzzi Yuri 78 Ippolito Fabrizia 76 J Jacobi Juri 74 Janin Rivolin Umberto 58 Janssen-Jansen Leonie 81 Jay Stephen 100 Jefferies Thomas 87 Jeffery Philip 86 Jha-Thakur Urmila 58 Jiménez Huerta Edith Rosario 66 Jogan Igor 62 Jones Peter 81 Jorgensen Anna 67 Jung Wolfgang 74 K Kaberi Katerina 91 Kaller Richard 96 | 133 Index of Authors Kamel Nabil 81, 88 Kangasoja Jonna 85 Kanonier Arthur 61, 66 Kanyama Ahmad 65 Kaparos George 66 Karadimitriou Nikos 60 Karka Gabriella 74 Karstkarel Nanka 100 Kidd Sue 96 Klemm Wiebke 71 Knapp Sonja 85 Knierbein Sabine 81 Knikkink Hans 74 Knox Paul 87 Koca Feray 95 Kohlb6éck Dietmar 96 Koll-Schretzenmayr Martina 86 Korthals Altes Willem 60 Kotval Zenia 95 Kuda Frantisek 74 Kule Laila 100 Kurunmaki Kimmo 76 L La Varra Giovanni 77 Laine Markus 76 Laino Giovanni 71 Lake Amelia 98 Lalenis Konstantinos 86 Lallau Benoit 92 Lambert Christine 75 Langeland Anders 99 Lapintie Kimmo 97 Lecis Cocco Ortu Matteo 80 Lee Kathleen 88 Lee Shin 91, 99 Leheis Stéphanie 66 Leinfelder Hans 92 Leino Helena 76 Leon Gomez Noemi 85 Lieto Laura 78 Lin Chang-Yu 85 Lino Barbara 80 Linzer Helena 63 Littlewood Steve 84, 100 Lloyd Greg 60, 93 || _— 134 aaiee Index of Authors Lloyd-Jones Tony 64 Lo Piccolo Francesco 75 Lodrini Sara 61 London Jim 96 Low Nicholas 66 Lucciarini Silvia 60 Ludlow David 89 Luthi Stefan 59 Mac Giolla Chriost Diarmait 64 MacCallum Diana 64 Macchi Gianfranco 97 Machemer Patricia 69 Maggio Grazia 77, 85 Mahajan Sulakshana 79 Marconi Giovanna 79 Marotta Paola 71, 77 Mayer Heike 87 Mazzeo Giuseppe 86 McCarthy John 58 McCown Ken 63 McWhirter Catharine 75 Medici Tiziana 88 Mei Giovanni 96 Melissas Dimitrios 86 Mello Daniela 96 Meloni Noemi 80, 96 Memon Ali 76 Menezes Marluci 64 Menoni Scira 67, 84 Mesolella Anna 93 Messina Salvatore 69 Metaxas Theodore 99 Meyer Burghard 67 Meyer Julia 97 Michailidis Triantafyllos 64 Migliaccio Anna 95 Mihola Marek 94 Milesi Alessandra 80, 96 Mininni Mariavaleria 95 Moi Donatella 96 Molinari Daniela 84 Monno Valeria 96 Monteleone Germano 65 Moore Andrew 98 aaa 135 camel Index of Authors Morgado Sofia 94 Morlicchio Enrica 65 Moroni Stefano 71 Morrison Nicky 86 Morrow Jones Hazel 58 Motte Alain 70 Moulaert Frank 65, 67 Moustafa Amer 98 Mukhopadhyay Chandrima 70 Muller Bernhard 58 Muller Larissa 79 Mullin John 91 Mun’oz Gielen Demetrio 81 Murano Chiara 61 Murphy Stacey 76 Nadin Vincent 58 Naess Petter 83 Najjar Raed 85 Nam Sylvia 79 Nardelli Mirella 77 Nelson Suzy 80 Neuman Michael 69 Neumann Alexander 90 Neuvel Jeroen 63, 66 NG Mee Kam 89, 93 Niemann Lars 69 Nilsson Kristina L 69 Nordahl Berit 92 Nucci Lucia 64 Nyseth Torill 65 fo} Oades Richard 72 Occelli Sylvie 72 Odendaal Nancy 88 Oliveira Carlos 59 Olsson Krister 93 Oranje Mark 68 Ortacesme Veli 82 Ortiz Eva-Leticia 82 Ottens Henk 78 Otto Andreas 58 — Index of Authors | P Palestino Maria Federica 82 Papa Enrica 99 Papaioannou Thanos 64 Papatheochari Theodora 77 Park Jung Jin 67 Park Jung Yoon 99 Pasqui Gabriele 57 Pastore Maria Chiara 93 Pavan Valentina 87 Peel Deborah 58, 93 Peltonen Lasse 85, 96 Pemberton Simon 90 Pena Sergio 88 Peritore Romina 93 Perry David 58 Peters Deike 98 Picchio Stefano 72 Piccinelli Maria Chiara 93 Pieterse Nico 92 Pineschi Giovanni 84 Pinhanez Monica 70 Pinzello Ignazia 71 Pisman Ann 90 Pizarro Rafael 90 Plaut Pnina O. 72 Pletnicka Jana 74 Ponzini Davide 92 Porrello Antonino 82 Priemus Hugo 90 Procaccini Costanzo 66 Prosperi David 61 Punter John 87 Puscasu Violeta 95 Pusceddu Clara 66 Puustinen Sari 85 Rabino Giovanni 72 Rega Carlo 63, 83 Reho Matelda 96 Reicher Christa 91 Rezende Denis A. 87 Rienzo Michele 88 Ritterhoff Frank 86 — 137 Index of Authors Roberts Marion 81 Rodrigues Carlos 69 Romano Claudia 78 Rongerude Jane 80 Rosa Pires Artur 69 Rotem-Mindali Orit 63 Rowe James 83 Roy Ananya 75 Runhaar Hens 73 Russo Michelangelo 81 Russo Vincenzo 88 S Saey Pieter 87 Sager Tore 78 Saifoulline Rinat 63 Salet Willem 66, 81 Samakovlija Marcella 61 Sanna Riccardo 96 Santaoja Minna 76 Santinha Gongalo 79 Santos Cruz Sara 81 Sapounizaki Kalliopi 83 Sartorio Francesca S. 91 Savvides Andreas L 87 Sayan M. Selcuk 82 Schaefer Nicole 97 Schanze Jochen 61 Scheurer Jan 98 Schilleci Filippo 73 Schindegger Friedrich 68 Schmeidler Karel 82 Schoenwandt Walter 63, 74 Schreurs Jan 98 Schuiling Dick 60 Schulze Baing Andreas 100 Scolozzi Rocco 78 Searle Glen 65 Segeren Arno 77 Selicato Francesco 77 Selman Paul 67 Senol Pervin 77 Sepe Maria Teresa 79 Sepe Marichela 87 Serraos Konstantinos 91 Servillo Loris 89 \— 138 a Index of Authors Sessa Salvatore 61 Shahaf Nehemia 878 Shaheen Lubna 83 Shaw Dave 86 Short Michael 87 Shoshkes Ellen 69 Silva Cecilia 82 Silva Elisabete 71, 83 Silva Giovanna Maria 93 Silva Paulo 91, 94, 97 Simbula Matteo 78 Sirry Azza 99 Skaburskis Andrejs 65 Skayannis Pantelis 66 Sliuzas Richard 78 Smith Robert 80 Sobral Nuno 69 Soer Laila 73 Sofianopoulos Dimitrios 64, 91 Sonn Jung Won 98 Spaziante Agata 61 Spit Tejo 81 Squires Graham 60 Stanic Ivan 93 Stav Tamy 93 Stead Dominic 58, 68, 77, 99 Steele Wendy 69 Stevens Claire 90 Stiftel Bruce 70 Straatemeier Thomas 89, 94 Strommen Kathrine 82 Sumares David 67 Svanda Nina 96 Swanwick Carys 67 Sykes Olivier 63 T Tait Malcolm 79 Tarlock Dan 71 Tatzberger Gabriele 68 te Brémmelstroet Marco 89 Tedesco Carla 97 Tennekes Joost 92 Theodora Yiota C. 97 Thierstein Alain 59, 91 Thoidou Elisavet 64 = 139 Thomas Huw 64 Thomas Kevin 84 Throgmorton James 79 Thung Tanja 90 Tippett Joanne 63, 68 Tisma Alexandra 71 Todaro Vincenzo 71, 73 Tomaselli Carmelo 69 Tommarchi Enrico 82 Torres Nilton 80, 89 Torresani Francesco 92 Townshend Tim 98 Traldi Fonseca Marcelo 92, 98 Triantafyllopoulos Nikolaos 98 Triolo Francesca 76 Troeva Vesselina 61 Trusina Inese 73 Trusins Jekabs 74 Tschirk Werner 63 Tseng Yen-Ning 72 Tubex Stefaan 80 Index of Authors U Ultramari Clovis 97 Unalan Dilek 64 Unbehaun Wiebke 90 Unsal Fatma 86 Upadhyaya Debabardhan 91 Ursida Anna 64, 69 Usai Nevio 96 Uttaro Anna 90 Vv Van den Brink Adri 67, 95 van der Knaap Wim 73, 84 van der Krabben Erwin 65 van der Stoep Hetty 95 van der Veen Menno 81 van der Vlies Vincent 91 van Dijk Terry 95 van Huyssteen Elsona 68 van Nes Akkelies 94 van Rij Evelien 90 van Wezemael Joris Ernest 72 | = 140 — Index of Authors Vani Marco 85 Vanin Fabio 85 Vasconcelos Lia 64, 70 Vayrynen Erja 98 Verhage Roelof 60 Vitellio Ilaria 90 Vivant Elsa 95 Voermanek Katrin 63 Voigt Andreas 63 Vojvodik Martin 74 Vojvodikova Barbara 74 Volker Kreibich 92 Voluer Loic 80 von der Weth Ridiger 63 Vukmirovic Milena 94 Ww Waterhout Bas 58, 93 Watson Vanessa 62 Weber Gerlind 75 While Aidan 100 Wiechmann Thorsten 59 Wissink Bart 86 Witthoeft Gesa 70 Wittmann Maxmilian 65 Wolsink Maarten 89 Wright Philip 72 Y Yewlett Chris 72 Yildirim Emrah 82 Yuen Belinda 65 z Zhu Jieming 97 Zigouri Fotini 99 Zipser Tadeusz 83 Zipser Wawrzyniec 83 Zito Maria Adelaide 58 Zoete Paul 81 Zonneveld Wil 68, 93 Zoppi Corrado 71 Zuidema Christian 73 eae 141 Finito di stampare in Napoli nel mese di Luglio 2007 presso le Officine Grafiche Francesco Giannini & Figli